In-plane drift capacity at near collapse of rocking unreinforced calcium silicate and clay masonry piers

More Info
expand_more

Abstract

In recent years, seismic assessment of existing unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is being increasingly based on nonlinear methods. The in-plane displacement capacity represents one of the most crucial yet still debated features of the nonlinear behaviour of URM piers. International codes often employ empirical models to estimate the pier ultimate drift. These models usually depends on the failure mode (flexure or shear) and on the properties of the pier (such as geometry, material properties, boundary or loading conditions). The present work focuses on the displacement capacity of Dutch masonry piers, or walls comparable to those, failing after the activation of a rocking mechanism. As a consequence, a dataset of 38 quasi-static tests on URM piers representative of the Dutch masonry is constructed and statistically analysed. The dataset, that includes also new laboratory tests recently performed at Delft University of Technology, consists of both calcium silicate and clay brick masonry piers characterised by low axial compressive loads and limited thickness. The displacement capacity of calcium silicate masonry is of special interest because it was not investigated in the past as extensively as for clay brick masonry. The analysis of the dataset highlights the influence of axial load ratio, aspect ratio and pier height on the drift capacity of Dutch rocking URM piers, whereas the other parameters do not appear to have a remarkable impact. Subsequently, a new empirical equation is derived and calibrated against the dataset. The accuracy of the proposed equation is assessed by comparing it to empirical models recommended in international standards and in the literature. For the considered dataset, representative of Dutch rocking URM piers, the proposed equation improves the accuracy of the predictions and fairly reproduces the dependence of the experimental drift capacity on the principal wall parameters.

Files

In_plane_drift_capacity_at_nea... (.pdf)
(.pdf | 2.51 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 12-03-2020