Rigid-body kinematics versus flapping kinematics of a flapping wing micro air vehicle

Journal article (2015)
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering (Aerospace Engineering) (TU Delft)
Copyright: © 2015 The Authors and AIAA
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

31-12-2015

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Source:

Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics: 38(12)2015; Post-Print version

ISSN:

0731-5090

Source:

http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.G000923

Faculty

Aerospace Engineering

Abstract

Several formulations have been proposed to model the dynamics of ornithopters, with inconclusive results regarding the need for complex kinematic formulations. Furthermore, the impact of assumptions made in the collected results was never assessed by comparing simulations with real flight data. In this study two dynamic models of a Flapping Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle (FWMAV) were derived and compared: a) single rigid body aircraft equations of motion and b) Virtual Work Principle derivation for multiple rigid body flapping kinematics. The aerodynamic forces and moments were compared by feeding the states that were reconstructed from the position and attitude data of a 17 gram free flying FWMAV into the dynamic equations of both formulations. To understand the applicability of rigid body formulations to FWMAVs, six wing-to-body mass ratios and two wing configurations were studied using real flight data. The results show that rigid body models are valid for the aerodynamic reconstruction of FWMAVs with four wings in ‘X’ configuration and two-winged FWMAV with a total wing-to-body mass ratio below 24% and 5.6%, respectively, without considerable information loss.

Files

318775.pdf
(pdf | 1.33 Mb)