Print Email Facebook Twitter How Can Procurement Contribute to Network Performance? Streamlining Network, Project and Procurement Objectives Title How Can Procurement Contribute to Network Performance? Streamlining Network, Project and Procurement Objectives Author Leendertse, W. Arts, J. De Ridder, H. Faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences Date 2012-12-31 Abstract The core business of governmental organizations like Rijkswaterstaat in the Netherlands is the optimal management of road-end waterway networks. The coming years many maintenance, renewal and extension projects will be executed in these networks. Projects give a disturbance in functionality of the network. Network management is to keep this disturbance as low as possible and make functionality of the networks as high as possible. In reality however projects define their own objectives. To realize projects market involvement is necessary. Rijkswaterstaat has a procurement policy which aims at optimizing the transaction i.e. best quality for a competitive prize. However, through projects and transactions objectives seem to fade away from the core business of Rijkswaterstaat. Involvement of the market in public networks is about finding the right balance between keeping control on product and production processes and shifting freedom in design and related responsibility to the market. The more freedom is given to the market in the project transaction, the more difficult it is to manage the network on super project level. Dutch government policy tends to shift more and more freedom and responsibility to the market. A comparison with other types of networks shows that this is adverse to the policy in more business driven networks. Disturbances are kept as short and controlled as possible. The main question in this paper is how value optimization in projects and procurement can add value for network governance in public networks and at the same time leave enough design freedom to the market for the development of a more resource based construction industry in infrastructure. From the comparison of different networks potential instruments are discussed. Subject network governancenetwork performancepublic value chaintransactionconstruction marketprocurementproject managementincentivesnetwork and customer value To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:f35b77f6-db7f-4204-bc38-e642c87ae931 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1263 Publisher Elsevier ISSN 1877-0428 Source Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 2012 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2012 The Author(s)Elsevier Files PDF Leendertse.pdf 525.7 KB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:f35b77f6-db7f-4204-bc38-e642c87ae931/datastream/OBJ/view