Background Accurate quantification of iodine uptake is essential for performing pre-treatment dosimetry of ¹³¹I therapy after redifferentiation of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. Standardized procedures for ¹²⁴I PET/CT-based dosimetry are currently lacking. We aim to evaluate the relation between ¹⁸F and ¹²⁴I imaging for two different PET/CT scanners, the effect of bias correction on recovery across scanners and investigate the impact of clinically-encountered background (BG)-to-lesion ratios on recovery correction. Methods Cylindrical and NEMA body phantoms were scanned following vendor-recommended ¹²⁴I acquisition using clinically representative activity concentrations (5.6–5.7 kBq/mL in cylindrical phantom, 45.1–59.2 kBq/mL in NEMA spheres) and BG-to-sphere ratios (∼1:125 to 1:infinity) using two digital PET/CT scanners (Philips Vereos and GE Healthcare Omni). Additionally, BG-to-sphere ratio ∼1:10 was acquired to compare ¹²⁴I to the EARL ¹⁸F standards 1 (EARL1). Calibration accuracy and recovery coefficients (RC_max, RC_mean) were compared between scanners with and without bias correction. Results ¹²⁴I recovery was ∼20% higher for the Omni compared to the Vereos, showing calibration accuracies of 1.12–1.15 vs. 0.94, and RC_mean reaching 0.86 vs. 0.69. After bias correction, RC_mean was comparable between scanners ('1%) but below the lower limits of EARL1. A single fit for recovery correction (R² = 0.97) was obtained for different BG-to-sphere ratios for both scanners as RC_mean was comparable (p ' 0.4). Conclusion Vendor-recommended ¹²⁴I acquisition and reconstruction leads to differences in quantification but can be compensated using a bias correction. Recovery correction is minimally affected by different BG-to-lesion ratios, suggesting that one RC curve is sufficient, simplifying ¹²⁴I calibration procedures in studies requiring ¹²⁴I quantification.

Purpose: Nipple discharge is the third most common breast-related complaint. It is recommended to exclude malignancy in pathologic nipple discharge (PND). Mammography and ultrasound are the first-line conventional diagnostic (CD) imaging. Although magnetic resonance is often used as a complementary modality, molecular breast imaging (MBI) with Tc-99m sestamibi may be a suitable alternative. Considering the lack of information on this subject and its clinical importance, this study aimed to evaluate the role of MBI in ruling out malignancy in patients with PND and negative/indeterminate CD. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort single-center study including all patients with PND evaluated by CD and MBI between 2012 and 2020. Pathology was considered the gold standard. Follow-up was used when pathology was not available. Results: Of the 96 cases of PND included, 78 were benign, and 18 (20%) corresponded to breast cancer (BC). Although CD and MBI were concordant in the BIRADS classification in 81% (78/96), half of BC were detected by MBI only. BC was located directly behind the nipple in a minority of patients (11%), meaning that MBI could significantly prevent futile central ductal excision. MBI presented higher sensitivity (83% vs. 33%) and negative predictive value (96% vs. 86%) than CD alone, with similar specificity (89% vs. 92%) and positive predictive value (63% vs. 50%). The area under the curve of MBI and CD was 0,86 (P-value<0.001 [95% CI: 0.75-0.97]) and 0.63 (P-value=0.091 [95% CI: 0.47-0.79]), respectively. Conclusions: MBI showed good diagnostic accuracy for detecting BC in patients with PND with negative/indeterminate findings on CD imaging.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females worldwide. Nuclear medicine plays an important role in patient management, not only in initial staging, but also during follow-up. Radiopharmaceuticals to study breast cancer have been used for over 50 years, and several of these are still used in clinical practice, according to the most recent guideline recommendations.In this critical review, an overview of nuclear medicine procedures used during the last decades is presented. Current clinical indications of each of the conventional nuclear medicine and PET/CT examinations are the focus of this review, and are objectively provided. Radionuclide therapies are also referred, mainly summarising the methods to palliate metastatic bone pain. Finally, recent developments and future perspectives in the field of nuclear medicine are discussed. In this context, the promising potential of new radiopharmaceuticals not only for diagnosis, but also for therapy, and the use of quantitative imaging features as potential biomarkers, are addressed.Despite the long way nuclear medicine has gone through, it looks like it will continue to benefit clinical practice, paving the way to improve healthcare provided to patients with breast cancer.