Energy efficiency is a key goal for the Quooker system. To further increase the energy efficiency of the Quooker system, this study investigates a possible heat integration system where the waste heat from the refrigeration cycle for chilled drinking water is implemented to preheat water before entering the boiling water reservoir.
Due to the intermittent nature of both the supply of heat, which is coupled to the control scheme of the chilled water reservoir and the demand for heat, which is determined by the user, a thermal storage system is required. Literature showed that the best refrigeration system for this application was a vapour compression system using a natural refrigerant such as isobutane. The most efficient heat storage could be done using organic phase change materials (PCM). Using a PCM allows the system to retain more energy in the same volume due to the latent heat in the system. To enhance the heat transfer between the fluid streams and the PCM, a fin-and-tube heat exchanger concept was designed. This concept, coupled with existing Quooker system demands, leads to a preliminary set of design requirements as well as a set of variables left to be optimised by modelling. The heat transfer from the refrigerant to the tubes was modelled using known correlations for condensation in tubes. The heat transfer between tubes and fins was modelled using a two-dimensional finite difference scheme. The heat transfer between the tubes and the water was modelled using forced convection models. The models gave dimensions for the size of the PCM container, the number of passes for each fluid stream and the thickness and spacing of the heat transfer fins. An experimental setup based on the optimal design was created to validate the models. The results showed that PCM storage is an effective manner to store thermal energy. Heat transfer was significant in the regions surrounding the tubes. Further away from the tubes, the fins did not provide enough heat transfer to utilise the whole storage capacity effectively. In its current design state, the system would have an economic payback time of around 20 years. With small design improvements, such as increasing the fin thickness and decreasing the fin distance, the payback period can be brought down significantly. The added product value from being a more efficient product makes the concept promising for future implementation.