Graphs are becoming more popular day by day. This has lead to the development of different graph-processing platforms, such as Hadoop, Apache Giraph and GraphLab. With this wide variety of graph processing platforms, which one should we choose for a specific use case? Which platform has the best performance? To solve this issue, we can benchmark the different platforms. Our client developed a benchmark suite for graph processing platforms: the LDBC Graphalytics. Users can run the benchmark on the platforms and benchmark result files are generated. This result file contains thousands of lines of information. This makes comparing the benchmark result files not practical. A way to compare the benchmark results easily is to make the platforms compete in competitions. The platforms are then ranked based on their performance. For this, a website is needed to hosts the competitions. In this project, we have developed a global competition website that serves as a solution.

With the increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI), there is a more significant opportunity for humans and agents to collaborate in teamwork. In Human-Agent Teamwork (HAT) settings, collaboration requires communication, and the agent displaying emotion can impact how human teammates communicate and work together with the agent. This study investigated the impact of an explainable agent expressing emotion within explanations in a teamwork setting. We investigated how integrating an emotional component into an agent’s explanations influences trust in the agent, as well as humans’ perceptions of the agent’s anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, and overall team performance when collaborating with the agent. With this goal, a pre-study was conducted using a focus-group meeting to investigate the relevant emotions to display in a simulated Search and Rescue (SAR) task and how these emotions can be incorporated into Explainable AI (XAI). Next, we conducted an in-between subject controlled experiment to study the effects of emotional components in explanations. The participants were divided into experimental and control groups, collaborating with agents that either displayed emotion or no emotion. The participants had to carry out a SAR task where they worked together with the agent to rescue victims. Our results confirmed that an agent displaying emotions increased perceived likeability, animacy, and anthropomorphism. Among these three, likeability and animacy are positively associated with trust. In contrast, an increase in anthropomorphism is associated with a decrease in trust. From the results, we could not conclude that team performance is directly affected by having emotion in the explanation. However, the results showed that emotion increases the messages sent from the human to the agent, and this increase in communication led to higher team performance.