Additional fixation of the palmar scapholunate interosseous ligament has been advocated to improve the long-term results of dorsal scapholunate interosseous ligament reconstruction. To investigate the validity of this approach, we determined normal scapholunate motion patterns and calculated the location of the scapholunate rotation axis. We hypothesized that the optimal location of the scapholunate interosseous ligament insertion could be determined from the scapholunate rotation axis. Four-dimensional computerized tomography was used to study the wrist motion in 21 healthy participants. During flexion–extension motions, the scaphoid rotates 38° (SD 0.6°) relative to the lunate; the rotation axis intersects the dorsal ridge of the proximal pole of the scaphoid and the dorsal ridge of the lunate. Minimal scapholunate motion is present during radioulnar deviation. Since the scapholunate rotation axis runs through the dorsal proximal pole of the scaphoid, this is probably the optimal location for attaching the scapholunate ligament during reconstructive surgery.@en

Introduction: Sensorimotor control can be disturbed because of pain and trauma. There is scarce comprehension about which component of the sensorimotor system would benefit the most from treatment in distal radius fracture (DRF). Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sensorimotor control of subjects with a history of DRF impaired compared with healthy subjects. If so, which component of the sensorimotor system is most affected. Methods: Nine healthy participants and 11 participants with a DRF history executed posture and reproduction tasks in interaction with a robotic wrist manipulator. A posture task with force perturbations assess sensorimotor control. Position and force reproduction tasks assessed sensory feedback. Electromyography recorded the muscle activity to study the motor part of the sensorimotor system. Study Design: Cross-sectional case-control. Results: The results showed that the motor responses to the perturbations during the posture task did not differ significantly, whereas the position reproduction did significantly differ between the 2 groups. Moreover, participants with a DRF history did not adapt to the changed dynamics of the environment during the posture task, whereas the controls did. Discussion: The results of this study imply that processing of sensory position feedback is impaired in people with a DRF history while sensorimotor control during a posture task is unaffected. A possible explanation for these results is that different neural networks are involved during reproduction and posture tasks. Conclusions: A history of DRF is related to disturbed processing of sensory feedback of the sensorimotor system, especially the Joint Position Sense, which leads to an impairment in detecting a changed environment and adapting to it. Impaired Joint Position Sense and thereby the inability to adapt adequately to a changing environment should be taken into account during the rehabilitation of patients with DRF.@en