JE

Jan Willem Erisman

info

Please Note

3 records found

Journal article (2026) - Zihao Yuan, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Guangliang Fu, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, Otto P. Hasekamp
This paper assesses the capability of liquid cloud droplet effective radius (CER) and cloud effective variance (CEV) retrieval from space-borne multi-angular hyperspectral measurements. The capability and sensitivity study is based on a neural network (NN) retrieval approach which is developed for the Spectropolarimeter for Planetary EXploration - one (SPEXone), a multi-angular hyperspectral polarimeter onboard Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) satellite. The synthetic measurements used in NN training and the sensitivity experiments are generated by Remote sensing of Trace gas and Aerosol Products (RemoTAP) forward model, and include variations of cloud, surface and aerosol properties, as well as cloud fraction. On the basic validation set, the NN performs similar over ocean and land with a mean absolute error (MAE) around 2μm on CER and around 0.04 on CEV. The performance over different cloud fraction (CF) and cloud optical thickness (COT) is evaluated, and indicates that most accurate retrievals can be performed for cases where CF >0.6 and COT between 2 and 12. The sensitivity to above-cloud aerosols (both fine-mode-dominated and dust-mode-dominated cases) suggests the retrieval is more sensitive to absorbing fine mode aerosols (CER MAE <2.5μm up to AOT of 0.2 for fully cloudy scene), than to dust aerosols (CER MAE <2.5μm up to AOT of 0.5). Moreover, the retrievals are virtually insensitive to above cloud cirrus over fully cloudy scene, but shows large sensitivity over partly cloudy scenes over land. Finally, synthetic measurements from partly cloudy scenes are generated based on the 3D MYSTIC radiative transfer model. The retrieval on these measurements suggests no significant 3D cloud radiative effect artifacts. ...
Journal article (2025) - Zihao Yuan, Guangliang Fu, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, Otto P. Hasekamp
This paper describes an algorithm for above-cloud aerosol (ACA) retrievals from PARASOL (Polarisation and Anisotropy of Reflectances for Atmospheric Science coupled with Observations from a Lidar) Multi-Angle Polarimetric measurements. The algorithm, based on neural networks (NNs), has been trained on synthetic measurements and has been applied to the processing of one-year PARASOL data. The algorithm makes use of three subsequent NNs: (1) for the detection of liquid clouds, (2) for the retrieval of aerosol properties for ACA cases, and (3) an NN forward model to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the retrieval. The NN’s theoretical capability of retrieval is investigated by several synthetic data studies. It is shown that the NNs retrieve ACAOT550 (above cloud aerosol optical thickness, at 550 nm), AE440–670 (Ångström exponent, between 440 and 670 nm), and SSA550 (single scattering albedo, at 550 nm) with an RMSE (root mean squared error) of ∼ 0.1 on ACAOT550, ∼ 0.4 on AE440–670 and ∼ 0.04 on SSA550 in synthetic experiments. Finally, comparison between the NN retrievals and adjacent PARASOL-RemoTAP clear-sky retrieval in 2008 shows good agreement within the range expected from the synthetic study. ...
Journal article (2024) - Zihao Yuan, Guangliang Fu, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, Otto P. Hasekamp
This paper describes a neural network cloud masking scheme from PARASOL (Polarization and Anisotropy of Reflectances for Atmospheric Science coupled with Observations from a Lidar) multi-angle polarimetric measurements. The algorithm has been trained on synthetic measurements and has been applied to the processing of 1 year of PARASOL data. Comparisons of the retrieved cloud fraction with MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) products show overall agreement in spatial and temporal patterns, but the PARASOL neural network (PARASOL-NN) retrieves lower cloud fractions. Comparisons with a goodness-of-fit mask from aerosol retrievals suggest that the NN cloud mask flags fewer clear pixels as cloudy than MODIS (∼ 3 % of the clear pixels versus ∼ 15 % by MODIS). On the other hand the NN classifies more pixels incorrectly as clear than MODIS (∼ 20 % by NN, versus ∼ 15 % by MODIS). Additionally, the NN and MODIS cloud mask have been applied to the aerosol retrievals from PARASOL using the Remote Sensing of Trace Gas and Aerosol Products (RemoTAP) algorithm. Validation with AERONET shows that the NN cloud mask performs comparably with MODIS in screening residual cloud contamination in retrieved aerosol properties. Our study demonstrates that cloud masking from multi-angle polarimeter (MAP) aerosol retrievals can be performed based on the MAP measurements themselves, making the retrievals independent of the availability of a cloud imager. ...