Jan Willem Erisman
Please Note
7 records found
1
No stress, let plants be your success!
A spatial suitability analysis for agricultural systems that could be promising for salinity, drought and waterlogging stress
A practical spatial approach is needed that combines SRAS knowledge with local data, helping decision-makers understand which SRAS options are feasible, where they are suitable, and what their implementation implies for key stakeholders. This was achieved by answering the question: ‘Which salt-resilient agricultural systems are potentially suitable for areas increasingly affected by salinization, drought, and waterlogging, and how can their spatial suitability be assessed and interpreted based on soil types and climate projections?’
To address this question, the case study Schouwen-Duiveland was investigated, because this region is already exposed to SDAW stressors. Both current conditions and a high 2050 climate scenario were assessed. This desk study developed a spatial suitability framework to evaluate the potential of SRAS based on four key factors: salinity levels, drought stress, waterlogging stress, and soil type.
Through a combination of literature review and geospatial analysing in QGIS, three promising SRAS approaches were identified for Schouwen-Duiveland. These include: 1.) Salt-tolerant crop rotation, which adapts conventional agricultural practices to include crops with higher salinity tolerance. 2.) Halophyte (plants that thrive on saline soils) intercropping or rotation, which can improve soil health by taking up salt from the soil while enabling cultivation of conventional crops. 3.) Agroforestry, a system based on trees or shrubs, which provides a higher tolerance to both drought and waterlogging, while also increasing biodiversity and potentially total yields.
Due to several data and knowledge gaps, assumptions had to be made, which reduce the robustness of the outcomes. Therefore, this study should be seen as an exploratory assessment rather than a set of definitive guidelines. Nevertheless, the results highlight the potential of these systems and emphasize the need for sustainable water management and location-specific guidelines, considering the local variability of stressors.
The spatial suitability maps were interpreted from both scientific and societal perspectives and are recognized as a tool to initiate social dialogue around the SRAS transition. These spatial guidelines can serve as practical tools for both policymakers and farmers.
Achieving a full transition requires increasing the readiness for change, starting with small-scale field experiments initiated by farmers, supported by policymakers who share the risks. Other key aspects include collaboration and knowledge sharing between stakeholders, which are essential for gaining further insights and improving spatial suitability assessment.
Despite its limitations, this study provides a foundation for a practical tool to assess local SRAS suitability. It contributes to informed discussions for SRAS transitions and ultimately supports the development of climate-resilient agriculture that strengthens long-term food security. ...
A practical spatial approach is needed that combines SRAS knowledge with local data, helping decision-makers understand which SRAS options are feasible, where they are suitable, and what their implementation implies for key stakeholders. This was achieved by answering the question: ‘Which salt-resilient agricultural systems are potentially suitable for areas increasingly affected by salinization, drought, and waterlogging, and how can their spatial suitability be assessed and interpreted based on soil types and climate projections?’
To address this question, the case study Schouwen-Duiveland was investigated, because this region is already exposed to SDAW stressors. Both current conditions and a high 2050 climate scenario were assessed. This desk study developed a spatial suitability framework to evaluate the potential of SRAS based on four key factors: salinity levels, drought stress, waterlogging stress, and soil type.
Through a combination of literature review and geospatial analysing in QGIS, three promising SRAS approaches were identified for Schouwen-Duiveland. These include: 1.) Salt-tolerant crop rotation, which adapts conventional agricultural practices to include crops with higher salinity tolerance. 2.) Halophyte (plants that thrive on saline soils) intercropping or rotation, which can improve soil health by taking up salt from the soil while enabling cultivation of conventional crops. 3.) Agroforestry, a system based on trees or shrubs, which provides a higher tolerance to both drought and waterlogging, while also increasing biodiversity and potentially total yields.
Due to several data and knowledge gaps, assumptions had to be made, which reduce the robustness of the outcomes. Therefore, this study should be seen as an exploratory assessment rather than a set of definitive guidelines. Nevertheless, the results highlight the potential of these systems and emphasize the need for sustainable water management and location-specific guidelines, considering the local variability of stressors.
The spatial suitability maps were interpreted from both scientific and societal perspectives and are recognized as a tool to initiate social dialogue around the SRAS transition. These spatial guidelines can serve as practical tools for both policymakers and farmers.
Achieving a full transition requires increasing the readiness for change, starting with small-scale field experiments initiated by farmers, supported by policymakers who share the risks. Other key aspects include collaboration and knowledge sharing between stakeholders, which are essential for gaining further insights and improving spatial suitability assessment.
Despite its limitations, this study provides a foundation for a practical tool to assess local SRAS suitability. It contributes to informed discussions for SRAS transitions and ultimately supports the development of climate-resilient agriculture that strengthens long-term food security.
Bridging Policy and Practice
Critical Assessment of the Role of Environmental Cooperatives in the the Netherlands in Contributing to Wider-EU Sustainability Targets and Exploration of Future Developmental Pathways. Case Study of BoerenNatuur
The circular economy in practice
Using an action research approach to determine the role of the Grondstoffenstation in shaping multiple value creation in the Afrikaanderwijk
Retinking Agriculture: Transitioning Towards Agroecology in South Holland
Examining Barriers and Enabler From the Agroecological Farmers’ Perspective
Towards a measurement-based approach to estimate farm-specific ammonia emissions
With feed management parameters and the slurry manure composition as indicators of the AEP
This study analyses the relationships within the feed-manure-AEP sequence. A comprehensive approach is used, involving 23 manure parameters and 12 feed management parameters. The most important predictors of the AEP include N, TAN, Norg, N90, and the C/N ratio, whilst urea in milk, pH, and DS showed low significance. Silage maize and VEM are identified as feed management parameters with a positive indirect relationship with the AEP, whereas other roughage and fresh grass exhibit a negative indirect relationship. The calculated TAN value plays a central role in the emission calculations of the Kringloopwijzer model. There are concerns about the accuracy of this value as well as the absence of other manure parameters in the calculation, highlighting the need for further research. Currently, it is uncertain whether the AEP measurements will be suitable for an emissions-based policy, due to the incapacity to directly represent actual ammonia emissions and the uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the results caused by the period prior to the measurements. Nonetheless, the measurements are valuable in assessing the influence of the manure composition on the AEP, and how it has been affected by feed management strategies. ...
This study analyses the relationships within the feed-manure-AEP sequence. A comprehensive approach is used, involving 23 manure parameters and 12 feed management parameters. The most important predictors of the AEP include N, TAN, Norg, N90, and the C/N ratio, whilst urea in milk, pH, and DS showed low significance. Silage maize and VEM are identified as feed management parameters with a positive indirect relationship with the AEP, whereas other roughage and fresh grass exhibit a negative indirect relationship. The calculated TAN value plays a central role in the emission calculations of the Kringloopwijzer model. There are concerns about the accuracy of this value as well as the absence of other manure parameters in the calculation, highlighting the need for further research. Currently, it is uncertain whether the AEP measurements will be suitable for an emissions-based policy, due to the incapacity to directly represent actual ammonia emissions and the uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the results caused by the period prior to the measurements. Nonetheless, the measurements are valuable in assessing the influence of the manure composition on the AEP, and how it has been affected by feed management strategies.