In the past decades the understanding of fracture of ductile material has increased substantially. Research has shown that the onset of fracture highly depends on the full state of stress inside the material. Better understanding of fracture resulted in more advanced and complex fracture models being conceived, allowing researchers to predict fracture in ductile solids with improved accuracy.


Nonlinear finite element analysis is a powerful tool at the disposal of researchers to predict the response of ship and offshore structures. When it comes to simulating accidental loads, such as collisions, often basic criteria are applied to include fracture in a finite element model. However, accurate fracture prediction is of great importance to determine the ice resilience of vessels, or to obtain reliable estimates of the sustained damage due to maritime collision. This research focuses on the latter.


This thesis is concerned with bridging the gap between the recent developments in fracture prediction and the application of failure criteria in finite element analysis of ship collision. A selection of recently published fracture models has been made and experiments have been conducted on S235 structural steel for calibration and validation of these models. Four small scale experiments have been conducted. These experiments serve a dual purpose: first, to gather information on the material behaviour during deformation. Second, to obtain information on the effect of different stress conditions on fracture. An iterative method has been employed to accurately model the material behaviour. For the calibration of the fracture models a method has been conceived and applied that takes into account the full histories of stress and strain during the deformation process up to fracture.

Before application as failure criteria for finite elements, the calibrated fracture models require a correction based on the size of the elements: a modification to an already existing theoretical framework has been proposed and applied to obtain element-size dependent failure criteria.


A large scale drop tower experiment has been designed to simulate a so called raking damage scenario. This experiment has been conducted on the same material as the small scale experiments and serves as a validation for a finite element model that has been created using the information on the material behaviour obtained from the small scale experiments. The different failure criteria have been implemented into the commercial finite element package LS-DYNA and have been applied to the finite element model. The results have been compared to the results of the raking damage experiment.


It was concluded that the application of complex multi-parameter failure models in analysis of maritime collision does not necessarily provide an improvement over conventional fracture prediction methods. The inability of shell elements to accurately describe strain concentrations and the effect of the element size introduce uncertainties that overrule the benefits of stress-state dependent prediction of element failure.