Christal van de Steeg-Henzen
Please Note
5 records found
1
Methods: A longitudinal magnetization preparation module was designed to encode |B+1 |. After magnetization tip-down, off-resonant Fermi pulses, placed symmetrically around two refocusing pulses, induced BSS, followed by tipping back of the magnetization. Bloch simulations were used to optimize refocusing pulse parameters and to assess the mapping sensitivity. Relaxation-induced B+1 error was simulated for various T 1 /T 2 times. The effective mapping range was determined in phantom experiments, and |B+1 | maps were compared to the conventional BSS method and subadiabatic hyperbolic-secant 8 (HS8) pulse-sensitized method. Cardiac B+1 maps were acquired in healthy subjects, and evaluated for repeatability and imaging plane intersection consistency. The technique was modified for three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of the whole heart in a single breath-hold, and compared to two-dimensional (2D) acquisition.
Results: Simulations indicate that the proposed preparation can be tailored to achieve high mapping sensitivity across various B+1 ranges, with maximum sensitivity at the upper B+1 range. T 1 /T 2 -induced bias did not exceed 5.2%. Experimentally reproduced B+1 sensitization closely matched simulations for B+1 ≥ 0.3B+1, max (mean difference 0.031±0.022, compared to 0.018±0.025 in the HS8-sensitized method), and showed 20-fold reduction in the standard deviation of repeated scans, compared with conventional BSS B+1 mapping, and an equivalent 2-fold reduction compared with HS8-sensitization. Robust cardiac B+1 map quality was obtained, with an average test-retest variability of 0.027±0.043 relative to normalized B+1 magnitude, and plane intersection bias of 0.052±0.031. 3D acquisitions showed good agreement with2D scans (mean absolute deviation 0.055±0.061).
Conclusion: BSS-based preparations enable robust and tailorable 2D/3D cardiac B+1 mapping at 3 T in a single breath-hold. ...
Methods: A longitudinal magnetization preparation module was designed to encode |B+1 |. After magnetization tip-down, off-resonant Fermi pulses, placed symmetrically around two refocusing pulses, induced BSS, followed by tipping back of the magnetization. Bloch simulations were used to optimize refocusing pulse parameters and to assess the mapping sensitivity. Relaxation-induced B+1 error was simulated for various T 1 /T 2 times. The effective mapping range was determined in phantom experiments, and |B+1 | maps were compared to the conventional BSS method and subadiabatic hyperbolic-secant 8 (HS8) pulse-sensitized method. Cardiac B+1 maps were acquired in healthy subjects, and evaluated for repeatability and imaging plane intersection consistency. The technique was modified for three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of the whole heart in a single breath-hold, and compared to two-dimensional (2D) acquisition.
Results: Simulations indicate that the proposed preparation can be tailored to achieve high mapping sensitivity across various B+1 ranges, with maximum sensitivity at the upper B+1 range. T 1 /T 2 -induced bias did not exceed 5.2%. Experimentally reproduced B+1 sensitization closely matched simulations for B+1 ≥ 0.3B+1, max (mean difference 0.031±0.022, compared to 0.018±0.025 in the HS8-sensitized method), and showed 20-fold reduction in the standard deviation of repeated scans, compared with conventional BSS B+1 mapping, and an equivalent 2-fold reduction compared with HS8-sensitization. Robust cardiac B+1 map quality was obtained, with an average test-retest variability of 0.027±0.043 relative to normalized B+1 magnitude, and plane intersection bias of 0.052±0.031. 3D acquisitions showed good agreement with2D scans (mean absolute deviation 0.055±0.061).
Conclusion: BSS-based preparations enable robust and tailorable 2D/3D cardiac B+1 mapping at 3 T in a single breath-hold.
To optimize Relaxation along a Fictitious Field (RAFF) pulses for rotating frame relaxometry with improved robustness in the presence of B0 and B1+ field inhomogeneities.
Methods
The resilience of RAFF pulses against B0 and B1+ inhomogeneities was studied using Bloch simulations. A parameterized extension of the RAFF formulation was introduced and used to derive a generalized inhomogeneity-resilient RAFF (girRAFF) pulse. RAFF and girRAFF preparation efficiency, defined as the ratio of the longitudinal magnetization before and after the preparation Mz (Tp / M0), were simulated and validated in phantom experiments. TRAFF and TgirRAFF parametric maps were acquired at 3T in phantom, the calf muscle, and the knee cartilage of healthy subjects. The relaxation time maps were analyzed for resilience against artificially induced field inhomogeneities and assessed in terms of in vivo reproducibility.
Results
Optimized girRAFF preparations yielded improved preparation efficiency (0.95/0.91 simulations/phantom) with respect to RAFF (0.36/0.67 simulations/phantom). TgirRAFF preparations showed in phantom/calf 6.0/4.8 times higher resilience to B0 inhomogeneities than RAFF, and a 4.7/5.3 improved resilience to B1+ inhomogeneities. In the knee cartilage, TgirRAFF (53 ± 14 ms) was higher than TRAFF (42 ± 11 ms). Moreover, girRAFF preparations yielded 7.6/4.9 times improved reproducibility across B0/B1+ inhomogeneity conditions, 1.9 times better reproducibility across subjects and 1.2 times across slices compared with RAFF. Dixon-based fat suppression led to a further 15-fold improvement in the robustness of girRAFF to inhomogeneities.
Conclusions
RAFF pulses display residual sensitivity to off-resonance and pronounced sensitivity to B1+ inhomogeneities. Optimized girRAFF pulses provide increased robustness and may be an appealing alternative for applications where resilience against field inhomogeneities is required. ...
To optimize Relaxation along a Fictitious Field (RAFF) pulses for rotating frame relaxometry with improved robustness in the presence of B0 and B1+ field inhomogeneities.
Methods
The resilience of RAFF pulses against B0 and B1+ inhomogeneities was studied using Bloch simulations. A parameterized extension of the RAFF formulation was introduced and used to derive a generalized inhomogeneity-resilient RAFF (girRAFF) pulse. RAFF and girRAFF preparation efficiency, defined as the ratio of the longitudinal magnetization before and after the preparation Mz (Tp / M0), were simulated and validated in phantom experiments. TRAFF and TgirRAFF parametric maps were acquired at 3T in phantom, the calf muscle, and the knee cartilage of healthy subjects. The relaxation time maps were analyzed for resilience against artificially induced field inhomogeneities and assessed in terms of in vivo reproducibility.
Results
Optimized girRAFF preparations yielded improved preparation efficiency (0.95/0.91 simulations/phantom) with respect to RAFF (0.36/0.67 simulations/phantom). TgirRAFF preparations showed in phantom/calf 6.0/4.8 times higher resilience to B0 inhomogeneities than RAFF, and a 4.7/5.3 improved resilience to B1+ inhomogeneities. In the knee cartilage, TgirRAFF (53 ± 14 ms) was higher than TRAFF (42 ± 11 ms). Moreover, girRAFF preparations yielded 7.6/4.9 times improved reproducibility across B0/B1+ inhomogeneity conditions, 1.9 times better reproducibility across subjects and 1.2 times across slices compared with RAFF. Dixon-based fat suppression led to a further 15-fold improvement in the robustness of girRAFF to inhomogeneities.
Conclusions
RAFF pulses display residual sensitivity to off-resonance and pronounced sensitivity to B1+ inhomogeneities. Optimized girRAFF pulses provide increased robustness and may be an appealing alternative for applications where resilience against field inhomogeneities is required.
Objective: Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) holds great promise for the early detection of cartilage deterioration. Here, a Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) framework is proposed for comprehensive and rapid quantification of T 1, T 2 ∗, and T RAFF2 with whole-knee coverage. Methods: A MRF framework was developed to achieve quantification of Relaxation Along a Fictitious Field in the 2nd rotating frame of reference (T RAFF2) along with T 1 and T 2 ∗. The proposed sequence acquires 65 measurements of 25 high-resolution slices, interleaved with 7 inversion pulses and 40 RAFF2 trains, for whole-knee quantification in a total acquisition time of 3:25 min. Comparison with reference T 1, T 2 ∗, and T RAFF2 methods was performed in phantom and in seven healthy subjects at 3 T. Repeatability (test-retest) with and without repositioning was also assessed. Results: Phantom measurements resulted in good agreement between MRF and the reference with mean biases of -54, 2, and 5 ms for T 1, T 2 ∗, and T RAFF2, respectively. Complete characterization of the whole-knee cartilage was achieved for all subjects, and, for the femoral and tibial compartments, a good agreement between MRF and reference measurements was obtained. Across all subjects, the proposed MRF method yielded acceptable repeatability without repositioning (R 2≥ 0.94) and with repositioning (R 2≥ 0.57) for T 1, T 2 ∗, and T RAFF2. Significance: The short scan time combined with the whole-knee coverage makes the proposed MRF framework a promising candidate for the early assessment of cartilage degeneration with quantitative MRI, but further research may be warranted to improve repeatability after repositioning and assess clinical value in patients.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop and optimize an adiabatic (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)) mapping method for robust quantification of spin-lock (SL) relaxation in the myocardium at 3T. Methods: Adiabatic SL (aSL) preparations were optimized for resilience against (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) inhomogeneities using Bloch simulations. Optimized (Formula presented.) -aSL, Bal-aSL and (Formula presented.) -aSL modules, each compensating for different inhomogeneities, were first validated in phantom and human calf. Myocardial (Formula presented.) mapping was performed using a single breath-hold cardiac-triggered bSSFP-based sequence. Then, optimized (Formula presented.) preparations were compared to each other and to conventional SL-prepared (Formula presented.) maps (RefSL) in phantoms to assess repeatability, and in 13 healthy subjects to investigate image quality, precision, reproducibility and intersubject variability. Finally, aSL and RefSL sequences were tested on six patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease and compared with LGE, (Formula presented.), and ECV mapping. Results: The highest (Formula presented.) preparation efficiency was obtained in simulations for modules comprising 2 HS pulses of 30 ms each. In vivo (Formula presented.) maps yielded significantly higher quality than RefSL maps. Average myocardial (Formula presented.) values were 183.28 (Formula presented.) 25.53 ms, compared with 38.21 (Formula presented.) 14.37 ms RefSL-prepared (Formula presented.). (Formula presented.) maps showed a significant improvement in precision (avg. 14.47 (Formula presented.) 3.71% aSL, 37.61 (Formula presented.) 19.42% RefSL, p < 0.01) and reproducibility (avg. 4.64 (Formula presented.) 2.18% aSL, 47.39 (Formula presented.) 12.06% RefSL, p < 0.0001), with decreased inter-subject variability (avg. 8.76 (Formula presented.) 3.65% aSL, 51.90 (Formula presented.) 15.27% RefSL, p < 0.0001). Among aSL preparations, (Formula presented.) -aSL achieved the better inter-subject variability. In patients, (Formula presented.) -aSL preparations showed the best artifact resilience among the adiabatic preparations. (Formula presented.) times show focal alteration colocalized with areas of hyper-enhancement in the LGE images. Conclusion: Adiabatic preparations enable robust in vivo quantification of myocardial SL relaxation times at 3T.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the clinical gold standard for the assessment of myocardial viability but requires injection of exogenous gadolinium-based contrast agents. Recently, T1ρ-mapping has been proposed as a fully non-invasive alternative for imaging myocardial fibrosis without the need for contrast agent injection. However, its applicability at high fields is hindered by susceptibility to MRI system imperfections, such as inhomogeneities in the B0 and B1+ fields. In this work we propose a single breath-hold ECG-triggered single-shot bSSFP sequence to enable T1ρ-mapping in vivo at 3T. Adiabatic T1ρ preparations are evaluated to reduce B0 and B1+ sensitivity in comparison with conventional spin-lock (SL) modules. Numerical Bloch simulations were performed to identify optimal parameters for the adiabatic pulses. Experiments yield T1ρ values in the myocardium equal to 48.13±54.08 ms for the best adiabatic preparation and 16.01±20.75 ms for the reference non-adiabatic SL, with 26.91% against 89.74% relative difference in T1ρ values across two shimming conditions. Both phantom and in vivo measurements show increased myocardium/blood contrast and improved resilience against system imperfections compared to non-adiabatic T1ρ preparations, enabling the use at 3T. Clinical relevance- Adiabatically-prepared T1ρ-mapping sequences form a promising candidate for non-contrast evaluation of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies at 3T.