Y. Zhang
Please Note
18 records found
1
Comparison of Amplitude- and Amplitude-Frequency-Modulated Pulses for Outer Volume Suppression in Cardiac MRI
Application to Myocardial T 2 Mapping
To evaluate single- and dual-band pulse modules for suppressing extra-cardiac signal in cardiac MRI, and test their applicability for time-efficient imaging with reduced FOV in myocardial 𝑇2 mapping at 3 T.
Methods
Outer Volume Suppression (OVS) was implemented using two regional saturation slabs, along the phase-encoding direction. Different Amplitude-Modulated (AM) and Amplitude-Frequency-Modulated (AM-FM) pulses were explored. AM sinc and AM-FM Hyperbolic Secant (HS) pulses, as single- (S:1b and HS:1b) and dual-band (S:2b and HS:2b) versions, were chosen for full evaluation. Pulses were individually optimized for minimal residual signal and optimal suppression-band profiles. Pulse performance was assessed through simulations and phantom experiments, and evaluated in seven healthy subjects using residual signal and quantitative myocardial 𝑇2 mapping with rFOV.
Results
In simulations, optimized HS pulses demonstrated superior suppression-band profile homogeneity and 𝐵0 robustness, while both pulse classes showed comparable 𝐵+1 sensitivity. Phantom data revealed better signal suppression with HS pulses (S:1b: 19.22% ± 3.23%, S:2b: 16.85% ± 6.80%, HS:1b: 4.66% ± 1.04%, HS:2b: 2.85% ± 1.01%). The residual difference across slabs was slightly reduced using simultaneous dual-band compared with sequential single-band approaches (S:1b: 3.81% vs. S:2b: 0.92%; HS:1b: 4.56% vs. HS:2b: 0.66%). In vivo, despite significantly lower residual with HS pulses (p = 0.0015) and visually observed artifacts with sinc pulses, no significant difference in 𝑇2 was observed across all configurations (p = 0.087) in myocardial 𝑇2 mapping.
Conclusion
AM-FM pulses achieved robust suppression of extra-cardiac signals, with dual-band implementations minimizing suppression-band differences. This can enable artifact-free rFOV imaging, for improved image quality in myocardial 𝑇2
mapping. ...
To evaluate single- and dual-band pulse modules for suppressing extra-cardiac signal in cardiac MRI, and test their applicability for time-efficient imaging with reduced FOV in myocardial 𝑇2 mapping at 3 T.
Methods
Outer Volume Suppression (OVS) was implemented using two regional saturation slabs, along the phase-encoding direction. Different Amplitude-Modulated (AM) and Amplitude-Frequency-Modulated (AM-FM) pulses were explored. AM sinc and AM-FM Hyperbolic Secant (HS) pulses, as single- (S:1b and HS:1b) and dual-band (S:2b and HS:2b) versions, were chosen for full evaluation. Pulses were individually optimized for minimal residual signal and optimal suppression-band profiles. Pulse performance was assessed through simulations and phantom experiments, and evaluated in seven healthy subjects using residual signal and quantitative myocardial 𝑇2 mapping with rFOV.
Results
In simulations, optimized HS pulses demonstrated superior suppression-band profile homogeneity and 𝐵0 robustness, while both pulse classes showed comparable 𝐵+1 sensitivity. Phantom data revealed better signal suppression with HS pulses (S:1b: 19.22% ± 3.23%, S:2b: 16.85% ± 6.80%, HS:1b: 4.66% ± 1.04%, HS:2b: 2.85% ± 1.01%). The residual difference across slabs was slightly reduced using simultaneous dual-band compared with sequential single-band approaches (S:1b: 3.81% vs. S:2b: 0.92%; HS:1b: 4.56% vs. HS:2b: 0.66%). In vivo, despite significantly lower residual with HS pulses (p = 0.0015) and visually observed artifacts with sinc pulses, no significant difference in 𝑇2 was observed across all configurations (p = 0.087) in myocardial 𝑇2 mapping.
Conclusion
AM-FM pulses achieved robust suppression of extra-cardiac signals, with dual-band implementations minimizing suppression-band differences. This can enable artifact-free rFOV imaging, for improved image quality in myocardial 𝑇2
mapping.
Pretrained segmentation models for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) struggle to generalize across different imaging sequences due to significant variations in image contrast. These variations arise from changes in imaging protocols, yet the same fundamental spin properties, including proton density, T1, and T2 values, govern all acquired images. With this core principle, we introduce Reverse Imaging, a novel physics-driven method for cardiac MRI data augmentation and domain adaptation to fundamentally solve the generalization problem. Our method reversely infers the underlying spin properties from observed cardiac MRI images, by solving ill-posed nonlinear inverse problems regularized by the prior distribution of spin properties. We acquire this “spin prior” by learning a generative diffusion model from the multiparametric SAturation-recovery single-SHot acquisition sequence (mSASHA) dataset, which offers joint cardiac T1 and T2 maps. Our method enables approximate but meaningful spin-property estimates from MR images, which provide an interpretable “latent variable” that lead to highly flexible image synthesis of arbitrary novel sequences. We show that Reverse Imaging enables highly accurate segmentation across vastly different image contrasts and imaging protocols, realizing wide-spectrum generalization of cardiac MRI segmentation.
Beyond the LUMIR challenge
The pathway to foundational registration models
Deformable image registration remains a central challenge in medical image analysis, particularly under multi-modal scenarios where intensity distributions vary significantly across scans. While deep learning methods provide efficient feed-forward predictions, they often fail to generalize robustly under distribution shifts at test time. A straightforward remedy is full network fine-tuning, yet for modern architectures such as Transformers or deep U-Nets, this adaptation is prohibitively expensive in both memory and runtime when operating in 3D. Meanwhile, the naive fine-tuning struggles more with potential degradation in performance in the existence of drastic domain shifts. In this work, we propose a registration framework that integrates a frozen pretrained mono-modal registration model with a lightweight adaptation pipeline for multi-modal image registration. Specifically, we employ style transfer based on contrast-agnostic representation generation and refinement modules to bridge modality and domain gaps with instance optimization at test time. This design is orthogonal to the choice of backbone mono-modal model, thus avoids the computational burden of full fine-tuning while retaining the flexibility to adapt to unseen domains. We evaluate our approach on the Learn2Reg 2025 LUMIR validation set and observe consistent improvements over the pretrained state-of-the-art mono-modal backbone. In particular, the method ranks second on the multi-modal subset, third on the out-of-domain subset, and achieves fourth place overall in Dice score. These results demonstrate that combining frozen mono-modal models with modality adaptation and lightweight instance optimization offers an effective and practical pathway toward robust multi-modal registration.
The low degree of labeling and limited photon count of fluorescent emitters in single molecule localization microscopy results in poor quality images of macro-molecular complexes. Particle fusion provides a single reconstruction with high signal-to-noise ratio by combining many single molecule localization microscopy images of the same structure. The underlying assumption of homogeneity is not always valid, heterogeneity can arise due to geometrical shape variations or distinct conformational states. We introduce a Point Cloud Variational Auto-Encoder that works directly on 2D and 3D localization data, to detect multiple modes of variation in such datasets. The computing time is on the order of a few minutes, enabled by the linear scaling with dataset size, and fast network training in just four epochs. The use of lists of localization data instead of pixelated images leads to just minor differences in computational burden between 2D and 3D cases. With the proposed method, we detected radius variation in 2D Nuclear Pore Complex data, height variations in 3D DNA origami tetrahedron data, and both radius and height variations in 3D Nuclear Pore Complex data. In all cases, the detected variations were on the few nanometer scale.
Methods: DIR-labeling was implemented for double ECG-gated myoASLsequences and compared with conventional Flow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery (FAIR) labeling using single inversions. In DIR-preparations, the FAIR-inversion pulses were immediately followed by an identical reinversion pulse, applied either slice-selectively or nonselectively. Bloch-equation-based simulation and phantom experiments were performed to evaluate the PN and SNR across a range of HR variabilities. Data from six healthy subjects were acquired to evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF), PN, and SNR in vivo.
Results: Simulation experiments showed that the averageMBFvalues remained nearly constant across the range of HR variabilities and were comparable across all three sequences. However, DIR-labeling allowed for greater recovery of the myocardial background signal, which mitigates the sensitivity to HR-dependent changes in the inversion time. Consequently, PN in the presence of HR variability was substantially reduced with DIR-labeling. For HR variabilities corresponding to the mean value observed in vivo, this resulted in a simulated SNR gain of 1.79 ± 0.90 for selective and 1.55 ± 0.77 for nonselective DIR-labeling. In vivo, DIR-labeling showed reduced PN, with 53% (p < 0.05)/44% (p = 0.16) less PN compared with conventional FAIR-myoASL, leading to an average SNR gain of 1.47 ± 0.63 (p = 0.09)/1.32 ± 0.57 (p = 0.84) with selective/nonselective reinversions.
Conclusion: The proposed DIR-preparations reduce sensitivity to HR variations and alleviate PN in double ECG-gated myoASL, improving the precision of myoASL-based perfusion quantification.
...
Methods: DIR-labeling was implemented for double ECG-gated myoASLsequences and compared with conventional Flow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery (FAIR) labeling using single inversions. In DIR-preparations, the FAIR-inversion pulses were immediately followed by an identical reinversion pulse, applied either slice-selectively or nonselectively. Bloch-equation-based simulation and phantom experiments were performed to evaluate the PN and SNR across a range of HR variabilities. Data from six healthy subjects were acquired to evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF), PN, and SNR in vivo.
Results: Simulation experiments showed that the averageMBFvalues remained nearly constant across the range of HR variabilities and were comparable across all three sequences. However, DIR-labeling allowed for greater recovery of the myocardial background signal, which mitigates the sensitivity to HR-dependent changes in the inversion time. Consequently, PN in the presence of HR variability was substantially reduced with DIR-labeling. For HR variabilities corresponding to the mean value observed in vivo, this resulted in a simulated SNR gain of 1.79 ± 0.90 for selective and 1.55 ± 0.77 for nonselective DIR-labeling. In vivo, DIR-labeling showed reduced PN, with 53% (p < 0.05)/44% (p = 0.16) less PN compared with conventional FAIR-myoASL, leading to an average SNR gain of 1.47 ± 0.63 (p = 0.09)/1.32 ± 0.57 (p = 0.84) with selective/nonselective reinversions.
Conclusion: The proposed DIR-preparations reduce sensitivity to HR variations and alleviate PN in double ECG-gated myoASL, improving the precision of myoASL-based perfusion quantification.
We extensively evaluated RIIR on brain MRI, lung CT, and quantitative cardiac MRI datasets, in terms of both registration accuracy and training data efficiency. Our experiments showed that RIIR outperformed a range of deep learning-based methods, even with only 5% of the training data, demonstrating high data efficiency. Key findings from our ablation studies highlighted the important added value of the hidden states introduced in the recurrent inference framework for meta-learning. Our proposed RIIR offers a highly data-efficient framework for deep learning-based medical image registration. ...
We extensively evaluated RIIR on brain MRI, lung CT, and quantitative cardiac MRI datasets, in terms of both registration accuracy and training data efficiency. Our experiments showed that RIIR outperformed a range of deep learning-based methods, even with only 5% of the training data, demonstrating high data efficiency. Key findings from our ablation studies highlighted the important added value of the hidden states introduced in the recurrent inference framework for meta-learning. Our proposed RIIR offers a highly data-efficient framework for deep learning-based medical image registration.
Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an increasingly important diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases. Yet, co-registration of all baseline images within the quantitative MRI sequence is essential for the accuracy and precision of quantitative maps. However, co-registering all baseline images from a quantitative cardiac MRI sequence remains a nontrivial task because of the simultaneous changes in intensity and contrast, in combination with cardiac and respiratory motion. To address the challenge, we propose a novel motion correction framework based on robust principle component analysis (rPCA) that decomposes quantitative cardiac MRI into low-rank and sparse components, and we integrate the groupwise CNN-based registration backbone within the rPCA framework. The low-rank component of rPCA corresponds to the quantitative mapping (i.e. limited degree of freedom in variation), while the sparse component corresponds to the residual motion, making it easier to formulate and solve the groupwise registration problem. We evaluated our proposed method on cardiac T1 mapping by the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence, both before and after the Gadolinium contrast agent administration. Our experiments showed that our method effectively improved registration performance over baseline methods without introducing rPCA, and reduced quantitative mapping error in both in-domain (pre-contrast MOLLI) and out-of-domain (post-contrast MOLLI) inference. The proposed rPCA framework is generic and can be integrated with other registration backbones.
Methods: A longitudinal magnetization preparation module was designed to encode |B+1 |. After magnetization tip-down, off-resonant Fermi pulses, placed symmetrically around two refocusing pulses, induced BSS, followed by tipping back of the magnetization. Bloch simulations were used to optimize refocusing pulse parameters and to assess the mapping sensitivity. Relaxation-induced B+1 error was simulated for various T 1 /T 2 times. The effective mapping range was determined in phantom experiments, and |B+1 | maps were compared to the conventional BSS method and subadiabatic hyperbolic-secant 8 (HS8) pulse-sensitized method. Cardiac B+1 maps were acquired in healthy subjects, and evaluated for repeatability and imaging plane intersection consistency. The technique was modified for three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of the whole heart in a single breath-hold, and compared to two-dimensional (2D) acquisition.
Results: Simulations indicate that the proposed preparation can be tailored to achieve high mapping sensitivity across various B+1 ranges, with maximum sensitivity at the upper B+1 range. T 1 /T 2 -induced bias did not exceed 5.2%. Experimentally reproduced B+1 sensitization closely matched simulations for B+1 ≥ 0.3B+1, max (mean difference 0.031±0.022, compared to 0.018±0.025 in the HS8-sensitized method), and showed 20-fold reduction in the standard deviation of repeated scans, compared with conventional BSS B+1 mapping, and an equivalent 2-fold reduction compared with HS8-sensitization. Robust cardiac B+1 map quality was obtained, with an average test-retest variability of 0.027±0.043 relative to normalized B+1 magnitude, and plane intersection bias of 0.052±0.031. 3D acquisitions showed good agreement with2D scans (mean absolute deviation 0.055±0.061).
Conclusion: BSS-based preparations enable robust and tailorable 2D/3D cardiac B+1 mapping at 3 T in a single breath-hold. ...
Methods: A longitudinal magnetization preparation module was designed to encode |B+1 |. After magnetization tip-down, off-resonant Fermi pulses, placed symmetrically around two refocusing pulses, induced BSS, followed by tipping back of the magnetization. Bloch simulations were used to optimize refocusing pulse parameters and to assess the mapping sensitivity. Relaxation-induced B+1 error was simulated for various T 1 /T 2 times. The effective mapping range was determined in phantom experiments, and |B+1 | maps were compared to the conventional BSS method and subadiabatic hyperbolic-secant 8 (HS8) pulse-sensitized method. Cardiac B+1 maps were acquired in healthy subjects, and evaluated for repeatability and imaging plane intersection consistency. The technique was modified for three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of the whole heart in a single breath-hold, and compared to two-dimensional (2D) acquisition.
Results: Simulations indicate that the proposed preparation can be tailored to achieve high mapping sensitivity across various B+1 ranges, with maximum sensitivity at the upper B+1 range. T 1 /T 2 -induced bias did not exceed 5.2%. Experimentally reproduced B+1 sensitization closely matched simulations for B+1 ≥ 0.3B+1, max (mean difference 0.031±0.022, compared to 0.018±0.025 in the HS8-sensitized method), and showed 20-fold reduction in the standard deviation of repeated scans, compared with conventional BSS B+1 mapping, and an equivalent 2-fold reduction compared with HS8-sensitization. Robust cardiac B+1 map quality was obtained, with an average test-retest variability of 0.027±0.043 relative to normalized B+1 magnitude, and plane intersection bias of 0.052±0.031. 3D acquisitions showed good agreement with2D scans (mean absolute deviation 0.055±0.061).
Conclusion: BSS-based preparations enable robust and tailorable 2D/3D cardiac B+1 mapping at 3 T in a single breath-hold.
Lost in Tracking
Uncertainty-Guided Cardiac Cine MRI Segmentation at Right Ventricle Base
Deep learning-based methods have achieved prestigious performance for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction, enabling fast imaging for many clinical applications. Previous methods employ convolutional networks to learn the image prior as the regularization term. In quantitative MRI, the physical model of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry is known, providing additional prior knowledge for image reconstruction. However, traditional reconstruction networks are limited to learning the spatial domain prior knowledge, ignoring the relaxometry prior. Therefore, we propose a relaxometry-guided quantitative MRI reconstruction framework to learn the spatial prior from data and the relaxometry prior from MRI physics. Additionally, we also evaluated the performance of two popular reconstruction backbones, namely, recurrent variational networks (RVN) and variational networks (VN) with U-Net. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves highly promising results in quantitative MRI reconstruction.
The euclidean space is evil
Hyperbolic attribute editing for few-shot image generation