Background: Lower limb malalignment increases the risk of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This study investigates the association between knee cartilage quality, assessed via MRI-based T2 mapping, and lower limb malalignment. It also examines whether cartilage quality is more influenced by bony or intra-articular malalignment. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of 156 knees from the IMI-APPROACH cohort, tibiofemoral cartilage T2 values were measured using high-resolution MRI, distinguishing superficial and deep layers. Malalignment was categorized into entire leg, bony, and intra-articular malalignment (via the Joint Line Convergence Angle). Correlations between T2 values and alignment were assessed using Spearman's rho. A subgroup analysis evaluated cartilage quality in constitutional malalignment (malalignment without intra-articular deviation). Results: Cartilage T2 values were significantly associated with alignment. Varus knees showed significantly longer T2 in the superficial medial cartilage (ρ = –0.2, p = 0.04), and valgus knees in the lateral compartment (ρ = 0.1, p = 0.35). Associations were strongest for intra-articular malalignment (ρ = 0.3, p < 0.01). In constitutional varus, a non-significant medial T2 prolongation was observed (ρ = –0.2, p = 0.28); no changes were found in constitutional valgus. Conclusion: Lower limb malalignment, particularly intra-articular malalignment, is associated with compartment-specific lower cartilage quality, as reflected by longer T2 values. Distinguishing between bony and intra-articular malalignment, rather than overall limb alignment, should be a focus of future studies on malalignment. Future research should explore whether constitutional malalignment and early cartilage alterations may trigger cartilage degeneration and KOA progression.

Objective: Herewith, we report the development of Orthopedic Digital Image Analysis (ODIA) software that is developed to obtain quantitative measurements of knee osteoarthritis (OA) radiographs automatically. Manual segmentation and measurement of OA parameters currently hamper large-cohort analyses, and therefore, automated and reproducible methods are a valuable addition in OA research. This study aims to test the automated ODIA measurements and compare them with available manual Knee Imaging Digital Analysis (KIDA) measurements as comparison. Design: This study included data from the CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee) initiative, a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands with 1,002 participants. Knee radiographs obtained at baseline of the CHECK cohort were included and mean medial/lateral joint space width (JSW), minimal JSW, joint line convergence angle (JLCA), eminence heights, and subchondral bone intensities were compared between ODIA and KIDA. Results: Of the potential 2,004 radiographs, 1,743 were included for analyses. Poor intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were reported for the JLCA (0.422) and minimal JSW (0.299). The mean medial and lateral JSW, eminence height, and subchondral bone intensities reported a moderate to good ICC (0.7 or higher). Discrepancies in JLCA and minimal JSW between the 2 methods were mostly a problem in the lateral tibia plateau. Conclusions: The current ODIA tool provides important measurements of OA parameters in an automated manner from standard radiographs of the knee. Given the automated and computerized methodology that has very high reproducibility, ODIA is suitable for large epidemiological cohorts with various follow-up time points to investigate structural progression, such as CHECK or the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).