SM
Sophie Morosoli
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Conference paper
(2025)
-
Karthikeya Puttur Venkatraj, Sophie Morosoli, Hannes Cools, Laurens Naudts, De Vreese Claes De Vreese, Natali Helberger, Pablo Cesar, Abdallah El Ali
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the way content is produced and integrated into journalistic workflows. The EU AI act's Article 50 sets up transparency requirements aimed at encouraging the adoption and disclosure of AI in an ethical and responsible manner. In this study, we organized focus group interviews with Dutch citizens (N=21) to understand their expectations and needs regarding AI disclosures in the context of news production and journalism. These conversations are essential to understand if legal and regulatory policies are grounded in real-world experiences of citizens, and adequately address their concerns and enhance their digital interactions. We found that citizens predominantly favor disclosures of AI usage in journalistic content, in the form of (1) source references, (2) visual indicators (logos/watermarks) and (3) have varying preferences regarding information presentation and interaction modalities. Our findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary approaches to align standardization efforts with AI disclosures for news media.
...
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the way content is produced and integrated into journalistic workflows. The EU AI act's Article 50 sets up transparency requirements aimed at encouraging the adoption and disclosure of AI in an ethical and responsible manner. In this study, we organized focus group interviews with Dutch citizens (N=21) to understand their expectations and needs regarding AI disclosures in the context of news production and journalism. These conversations are essential to understand if legal and regulatory policies are grounded in real-world experiences of citizens, and adequately address their concerns and enhance their digital interactions. We found that citizens predominantly favor disclosures of AI usage in journalistic content, in the form of (1) source references, (2) visual indicators (logos/watermarks) and (3) have varying preferences regarding information presentation and interaction modalities. Our findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary approaches to align standardization efforts with AI disclosures for news media.
Transparent AI Disclosure Obligations
Who, What, When, Where, Why, How
Conference paper
(2024)
-
Abdallah El Ali, Karthikeya Puttur Venkatraj, Sophie Morosoli, Laurens Naudts, Natali Helberger, Pablo Cesar
Advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) are resulting in AI-generated media output that is (nearly) indistinguishable from human-created content. This can drastically impact users and the media sector, especially given global risks of misinformation. While the currently discussed European AI Act aims at addressing these risks through Article 52's AI transparency obligations, its interpretation and implications remain unclear. In this early work, we adopt a participatory AI approach to derive key questions based on Article 52's disclosure obligations. We ran two workshops with researchers, designers, and engineers across disciplines (N=16), where participants deconstructed Article 52's relevant clauses using the 5W1H framework. We contribute a set of 149 questions clustered into five themes and 18 sub-themes. We believe these can not only help inform future legal developments and interpretations of Article 52, but also provide a starting point for Human-Computer Interaction research to (re-)examine disclosure transparency from a human-centered AI lens.
...
Advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) are resulting in AI-generated media output that is (nearly) indistinguishable from human-created content. This can drastically impact users and the media sector, especially given global risks of misinformation. While the currently discussed European AI Act aims at addressing these risks through Article 52's AI transparency obligations, its interpretation and implications remain unclear. In this early work, we adopt a participatory AI approach to derive key questions based on Article 52's disclosure obligations. We ran two workshops with researchers, designers, and engineers across disciplines (N=16), where participants deconstructed Article 52's relevant clauses using the 5W1H framework. We contribute a set of 149 questions clustered into five themes and 18 sub-themes. We believe these can not only help inform future legal developments and interpretations of Article 52, but also provide a starting point for Human-Computer Interaction research to (re-)examine disclosure transparency from a human-centered AI lens.