M.J.W. Flinsenberg

info

Please Note

<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>

Journal article (1)

1 records found

Respiratory rate monitoring in ICU patients and healthy volunteers using electrical impedance tomography

A validation study

Journal article (2024) - J. J. Wisse , M. J.W. Flinsenberg , A. H. Jonkman , T. G. Goos , D. Gommers

Objective. The respiratory rate (RR) is considered one of the most informative vital signals. A well-validated standard for RR measurement in mechanically ventilated patient is capnography; a noninvasive technique for expiratory CO2measurements. Reliable RR measurements in spontaneously breathing patients remains a challenge as continuous mainstream capnography measurements are not available. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of RR measurement using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in healthy volunteers and intensive care unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation and spontaneously breathing post-extubation. Comparator methods included RR derived from both capnography and bioimpedance electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements.Approach. Twenty healthy volunteers wore an EIT belt and ECG electrodes while breathing through a capnometer within a 10-40 breaths per minute (BPM) range. Nineteen ICU patients underwent similar measurements during pressure support ventilation and spontaneously breathing after extubation from mechanical ventilation. Stable periods with regular breathing and no artefacts were selected, and agreement between measurement methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements.Main result. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias less than 0.2 BPM, with tight limits of agreement (LOA) ±1.5 BPM in healthy volunteers and ventilated ICU patients when comparing EIT to capnography. Spontaneously breathing ICU patients had wider LOA (±2.5 BPM) when comparing EIT to ECG bioimpedance, but gold standard comparison was unavailable. RR measurements were stable for 91% of the time for capnography, 68% for EIT, and 64% of the ECG bioimpedance signals. After extubation, the percentage of stable periods decreased to 48% for EIT signals and to 55% for ECG bioimpedance.Significance. In periods of stable breathing, EIT demonstrated excellent RR measurement accuracy in healthy volunteers and ICU patients. However, stability of both EIT and ECG bioimpedance RR measurements declined in spontaneously breathing patients to approximately 50% of the time.