Background: Preoperative planning of patients diagnosed with pancreatic head cancer is difficult and requires specific expertise. This pilot study assesses the added value of three-dimensional (3D) patient models and computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms in determining the resectability of pancreatic head tumors. Methods: This study included 14 hepatopancreatobiliary experts from eight hospitals. The participants assessed three radiologically resectable and three radiologically borderline resectable cases in a simulated setting via crossover design. Groups were divided in controls (using a CT scan), a 3D group (using a CT scan and 3D models), and a CAD group (using a CT scan, 3D and CAD). For the perceived fulfillment of preoperative needs, the quality and confidence of clinical decision-making were evaluated. Results: A higher perceived ability to determine degrees and the length of tumor–vessel contact was reported in the CAD group compared to controls (p = 0.022 and p = 0.003, respectively). Lower degrees of tumor–vessel contact were predicted for radiologically borderline resectable tumors in the CAD group compared to controls (p = 0.037). Higher confidence levels were observed in predicting the need for vascular resection in the 3D group compared to controls (p = 0.033) for all cases combined. Conclusions: “CAD (including 3D) improved experts’ perceived ability to accurately assess vessel involvement and supports the development of evolving techniques that may enhance the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer”.

From diagnosis to patient scheduling, AI is increasingly being considered across different clinical applications. Despite increasingly powerful clinical AI, uptake into actual clinical workflows remains limited. One of the major challenges is developing appropriate trust with clinicians. In this paper, we investigate trust in clinical AI in a wider perspective beyond user interactions with the AI. We offer several points in the clinical AI development, usage, and monitoring process that can have a significant impact on trust. We argue that the calibration of trust in AI should go beyond explainable AI and focus on the entire process of clinical AI deployment. We illustrate our argument with case studies from practitioners implementing clinical AI in practice to show how trust can be affected by different stages in the deployment cycle.

Sustainable and resilient pavement infrastructure is critical for current economic and environmental challenges. In the past 10 years, the pavement infrastructure strongly supports the rapid development of the global social economy. New theories, new methods, new technologies and new materials related to pavement engineering are emerging. Deterioration of pavement infrastructure is a typical multi-physics problem. Because of actual coupled behaviors of traffic and environmental conditions, predictions of pavement service life become more and more complicated and require a deep knowledge of pavement material analysis. In order to summarize the current and determine the future research of pavement engineering, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) has launched a review paper on the topic of “New innovations in pavement materials and engineering: A review on pavement engineering research 2021”. Based on the joint-effort of 43 scholars from 24 well-known universities in highway engineering, this review paper systematically analyzes the research status and future development direction of 5 major fields of pavement engineering in the world. The content includes asphalt binder performance and modeling, mixture performance and modeling of pavement materials, multi-scale mechanics, green and sustainable pavement, and intelligent pavement. Overall, this review paper is able to provide references and insights for researchers and engineers in the field of pavement engineering.