R.P. Elisbao Martins Amaral
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Two setups are used to investigate differences between modeling a wind turbine nacelle by means of an actuator-line model (ALM) and a wall-model (WM) using large-eddy simulations. One advantage of the ALM is that it requires a lower mesh refinement, making it less computationally costly. In the first setup, the nacelle is in standalone configuration and the ALM results show a much lower turbulence intensity and a significantly slower wake recovery when compared to the WM cases. In the second setup, the nacelle is in a rotor-nacelle assembly configuration and many variations of the ALM are tested in order to match the results from the experiment addressed in the OC6 task phase III. Contrary to previous findings that the nacelle might affect the turbine loads, this study shows that the improved match with the experiment stems from the increased mesh refinement in the nacelle region rather than the actual presence of the nacelle. Nevertheless, the wake profiles in the near-wake show a very good agreement between the ALM and WM, regardless of the refinement in the nacelle region. These cases also show a higher wake deficit than not using any nacelle at all.
...
Two setups are used to investigate differences between modeling a wind turbine nacelle by means of an actuator-line model (ALM) and a wall-model (WM) using large-eddy simulations. One advantage of the ALM is that it requires a lower mesh refinement, making it less computationally costly. In the first setup, the nacelle is in standalone configuration and the ALM results show a much lower turbulence intensity and a significantly slower wake recovery when compared to the WM cases. In the second setup, the nacelle is in a rotor-nacelle assembly configuration and many variations of the ALM are tested in order to match the results from the experiment addressed in the OC6 task phase III. Contrary to previous findings that the nacelle might affect the turbine loads, this study shows that the improved match with the experiment stems from the increased mesh refinement in the nacelle region rather than the actual presence of the nacelle. Nevertheless, the wake profiles in the near-wake show a very good agreement between the ALM and WM, regardless of the refinement in the nacelle region. These cases also show a higher wake deficit than not using any nacelle at all.
Journal article
(2023)
-
Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Leonardo Pagamonci, Alessandro Bianchini, Néstor Ramos-García, Georg Pirrung, Rémi Corniglion, R.P. Elisbao Martins Amaral, A.C. Viré, More authors...
This study reports the results of the second round of analyses of the Offshore Code Comparison, Collaboration, Continued, with Correlation and unCertainty (OC6) project Phase III. While the first round investigated rotor aerodynamic loading, here, focus is given to the wake behavior of a floating wind turbine under large motion. Wind tunnel experimental data from the UNsteady Aerodynamics for FLOating Wind (UNAFLOW) project are compared with the results of simulations provided by participants with methods and codes of different levels of fidelity. The effect of platform motion on both the near and the far wake is investigated. More specifically, the behavior of tip vortices in the near wake is evaluated through multiple metrics, such as streamwise position, core radius, convection velocity, and circulation. Additionally, the onset of velocity oscillations in the far wake is analyzed because this can have a negative effect on stability and loading of downstream rotors. Results in the near wake for unsteady cases confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the rotor reduced frequency increases over 0.5. Additionally, differences across the simulations become significant, suggesting that further efforts are required to tune the currently available methodologies in order to correctly evaluate the aerodynamic response of a floating wind turbine in unsteady conditions. Regarding the far wake, it is seen that, in some conditions, numerical methods overpredict the impact of platform motion on the velocity fluctuations. Moreover, results suggest that the effect of platform motion on the far wake, differently from original expectations about a faster wake recovery in a floating wind turbine, seems to be limited or even oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
...
This study reports the results of the second round of analyses of the Offshore Code Comparison, Collaboration, Continued, with Correlation and unCertainty (OC6) project Phase III. While the first round investigated rotor aerodynamic loading, here, focus is given to the wake behavior of a floating wind turbine under large motion. Wind tunnel experimental data from the UNsteady Aerodynamics for FLOating Wind (UNAFLOW) project are compared with the results of simulations provided by participants with methods and codes of different levels of fidelity. The effect of platform motion on both the near and the far wake is investigated. More specifically, the behavior of tip vortices in the near wake is evaluated through multiple metrics, such as streamwise position, core radius, convection velocity, and circulation. Additionally, the onset of velocity oscillations in the far wake is analyzed because this can have a negative effect on stability and loading of downstream rotors. Results in the near wake for unsteady cases confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the rotor reduced frequency increases over 0.5. Additionally, differences across the simulations become significant, suggesting that further efforts are required to tune the currently available methodologies in order to correctly evaluate the aerodynamic response of a floating wind turbine in unsteady conditions. Regarding the far wake, it is seen that, in some conditions, numerical methods overpredict the impact of platform motion on the velocity fluctuations. Moreover, results suggest that the effect of platform motion on the far wake, differently from original expectations about a faster wake recovery in a floating wind turbine, seems to be limited or even oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.