Over the past twenty years, various commercial technologies have been deployed to remove ammonia (NH₄–N) from anaerobic digestion (AD) liquors. In recent years many anaerobic digesters have been upgraded to include a pre-treatment, such as the thermal hydrolysis process (THP), to produce more biogas, increasing NH₄–N concentrations in the liquors are costly to treat. This study provides a comparative techno-economic assessment of sidestream technologies to remove NH₄–N from conventional AD and THP/AD dewatering liquors: a deammonification continuous stirred tank reactor (PNA), a nitrification/denitrification sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and thermal ammonia stripping process with an ammonia scrubber (STRIP). The SBR and PNA were based on full-scale data, whereas the STRIP was designed using a computational approach to achieve NH₄–N removals of 90–95%. The PNA presented the lowest whole-life cost (WLC) over 40 years, with £7.7 M, while the STRIP had a WLC of £43.9 M. This study identified that THP dewatering liquors, and thus a higher ammonia load, can lead to a 1.5–3.0 times increase in operational expenditure with the PNA and the SBR. Furthermore, this study highlighted that deammonification is a capable and cost-effective nitrogen removal technology. Processes like the STRIP respond to current pressures faced by the water industry on ammonia recovery together with targets to reduce nitrous oxide emissions. Nevertheless, ammonia striping-based processes must further be demonstrated in WWTPs and WLC reduced to grant their wide implementation and replace existing technologies.

@en

Suspended sludge deammonification technologies are frequently applied for sidestream ammonia removal from dewatering liquors resulting from a thermal hydrolysis anaerobic digestion (THP/AD) process. This study aimed at optimizing the operation, evaluate the performance and stability of a full-scale suspended sludge continuous stirred tank reactor (S-CSTR) with a hydrocy-clone for anaerobic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AMX) biomass separation. The S-CSTR operated at a range of nitrogen loading rates of 0.08–0.39 kg N m⁻³ d⁻¹ displaying nitrogen removal efficiencies of 75–89%. The hydrocyclone was responsible for retaining 56–83% of the AMX biomass and the washout of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) was two times greater than AMX. The solid retention time (SRT) impacted on NOB washout, that ranged from 0.02–0.07 d⁻¹ . Additionally, it was demonstrated that an SRT of 11–13 d was adequate to wash-out NOB. Microbiome analysis revealed a higher AMX abundance (Candidatus scalindua) in the reactor through the action of the hydrocyclone. Overall, this study established the optimal operational envelope for deammonification from THP/AD dewatering liquors and the role of the hydrocyclone towards maintaining AMX in the S-CSTR and hence obtain process stability.

@en

The benefits of deammonification to remove nitrogen from sidestreams, i.e., sludge dewatering liquors, in municipal wastewater treatment plants are well accepted. The ammonia removal from dewatering liquors originated from thermal hydrolysis/anaerobic digestion (THP/AD) are deemed challenging. Many different commercial technologies have been applied to remove ammonia from sidestreams, varying in reactor design, biomass growth form and instrumentation and control strategy. Four technologies were tested (a deammonification suspended sludge sequencing batch reactor (S-SBR), a deammonification moving bed biofilm reactor (MEDIA), a deammonification granular sludge sequencing batch reactor (G-SBR), and a nitrification suspended sludge sequencing batch reactor (N-SBR)). All technologies relied on distinct control strategies that actuated on the feed flow leading to a range of different ammonia loading rates. Periods of poor performance were displayed by all technologies and related to imbalances in the chain of deammonification reactions subsequently effecting both load and removal. The S-SBR was most robust, not presenting these imbalances. The S-SBR and G-SBR presented the highest nitrogen removal rates (NRR) of 0.58 and 0.56 kg N m⁻³ d⁻¹, respectively. The MEDIA and the N-SBR presented an NRR of 0.17 and 0.07 kg N m⁻³ d⁻¹, respectively. This study demonstrated stable ammonia removal from THP/AD dewatering liquors and did not observe toxicity in the nitrogen removal technologies tested. It was identified that instrumentation and control strategy was the main contributor that enabled higher stability and NRR. Overall, this study provides support in selecting a suitable biological nitrogen removal technology for the treatment of sludge dewatering liquors from THP/AD.

@en

Deammonification is an established biological nitrogen removal process for dewatering liquors from anaerobic digestion. Different deammonification technologies are being commercialised varying in control philosophy, biomass structure and reactor design. In this study three different pilot scale deammonification technologies were investigated to assess total nitrogen removal from mixed (pre and post digestion) dewatering liquors originated from thermal hydrolysis based anaerobic digestion process. The technologies tested included a suspended sludge sequencing batch reactor (S-SBR), a moving bed biofilm reactor (MEDIA) and a granular sludge sequencing batch reactor (G-SBR). This is the first study to compare side-by-side, three different deammonification technologies. All tested technologies were operated according to the manufacturer guidelines and demonstrated suitable nitrogen removal at loads varying between 0.3-0.8 kgN m-3 d-1. During the operation of three technologies, periods of poor effluent quality due to disruptions or imbalances in the biological reactions were observed. The S-SBR had the lowest number of imbalances with 14 cases relating to free nitrous acid inhibition. Both S-SBR and MEDIA presented the highest nitrogen removal rate with 0.72 and 0.68 kgN m-3 d-1, respectively. The G-SBR achieved nitrogen removal rates of 0.31 kgN m-3 d-1 while presenting the highest number of imbalances that were related to inhibitive concentration of free ammonia or free nitrous acid of anammox. These inhibitions were caused by the control system relying on surrogate measurements for ammonia. Finally, only the S-SBR was operated at temperatures below 20 °C, caused by seasonal fluctuations, but still achieved nitrogen removal rates of 0.30 kgN m-3 d-1. The number of deammonification technologies is growing, however, only a few but contradictive comparison studies exist. This comparison study can provide support for selection of sidestream deammonification technologies, by identifying the critical parameters.@en