In recent years, CNN-based object detectors have been widely adopted in autonomous systems. Although their capabilities are employed across various industries, these detectors are inherently susceptible to adversarial attacks. Despite extensive studies on their effects on image classification, adversarial attacks remain largely unexplored in object detection. In particular, we note the reduced number of studies employing benchmarks for these types of attacks. Object detectors can be easily deceived by adding carefully devised perturbations to their inputs, rendering them unreliable. This study investigates the transferability of one such adversarial attack type, the Targeted Objectness Gradient (TOG), on different variations of the YOLO architecture to formally assess its vulnerability under different scenarios in the maritime domain. To investigate the significance of TOG adversarial attacks across variations of YOLO architectures and combinations of maritime datasets (all publicly available), we conducted a statistical analysis of black-box and white-box attacks. Our research questions were formulated to address a range of concerns that encompass various complexities to be considered in the detection of maritime objects. Our presented results underline the transferable nature of TOG adversarial attacks and the compelling need to benchmark such attacks in the maritime object detection domain.

Quantitative model refinement is an essential step in the model development cycle. Starting with a high level, abstract representation of a biological system, one often needs to add details to this representation to reflect changes in its constituent elements. Any such refinement step has two aspects: One structural and one quantitative. The structural aspect of the refinement defines an increase in the resolution of its representation, while the quantitative one specifies a numerical setup for the model that ensures its fit preservation at every refinement step. We discuss in this paper the implementation of quantitative model refinement in four extensively used biomodeling frameworks: ODE-based models,

There is growing interest in creating large-scale computational models for biological process. One of the challenges in such a project is to fit and validate larger and larger models, a process that requires more high-quality experimental data and more computational effort as the size of the model grows. Quantitative model refinement is a recently proposed model construction technique addressing this challenge. It proposes to create a model in an iterative fashion by adding details to its species, and to fix the numerical setup in a way that guarantees to preserve the fit and validation of the model. In this survey we make an excursion through quantitative model refinement – this includes introducing the concept of quantitative model refinement for reaction based models, for rule-based models, for Petri nets and for guarded command language models, and to illustrate it on three case studies (the heat shock response, the ErbB signaling pathway, and the self-assembly of intermediate filaments).

Reaction systems are a formal framework for modeling processes driven by biochemical reactions. They are based on the mechanisms of facilitation and inhibition. A main assumption is that if a resource is available, then it is present in sufficient amounts and as such, several reactions using the same resource will not compete concurrently against each other; this makes reaction systems very different as a modeling framework than traditional frameworks such as ODEs or continuous time Markov chains. We demonstrate in this paper that reaction systems are rich enough to capture the essential characteristics of ODE-based models. We construct a reaction system model for the heat shock response in such a way that its qualitative behavior correlates well with the quantitative behavior of the corresponding ODE model. We construct our reaction system model based on a novel concept of dominance graph that captures the competition on resources in the ODE model. We conclude with a discussion on the expressivity of reaction systems as compared to that of ODE-based models.

The iterative process of adding details to a model while preserving its numerical behavior is called quantitative model refinement, and it has been previously discussed for ODE-based models and for kappa-based models. In this paper, we investigate and compare this approach in three different modeling frameworks: rule-based modeling, Petri nets and guarded command languages. As case study we use a model for the eukaryotic heat shock response that we refine to include the acetylation of the heat shock factor. We discuss how to perform the refinement in each of these frameworks in order to avoid the combinatorial state explosion of the refined model. We conclude that Bionetgen (and rule-based modeling in general) is well-suited for a compact representation of the refined model, Petri nets offer a good solution through the use of colors, while the PRISM refined model may be much larger than the basic model.