Catamarans are popular in the offshore sector as they combine good transverse stability and ample deck space with low wave resistance. However, their slender hull shape results in low restoring qualities in heave and pitch motions. The large motions in rough weather can often result in water impacting the underside of the deck connecting the two hulls, a phenomenon called cross-deck slamming. The impulse excitation from cross-deck slamming can then produce a transient hydroelastic response of the structure called whipping. Whipping excites mode shapes that would not normally be present in the response, as their natural frequencies are significantly higher than the wave encounter frequency. This results in detrimental contributions to fatigue life through high-amplitude cyclical bending moments. Both the calculation of slamming loads and the prediction of resulting structural responses have been a challenge for several decades. The highly nonlinear and three-dimensional character of the phenomenon, combined with the strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction means that it is unpredictable, and even the definition of slamming events has been a matter of disagreement among researchers.\ Experiments are still a vital part of these investigations, for validating ever-improving numerical techniques. An essential issue with experiments is the extent to which mode shapes and natural frequencies can be emulated in model scale. Traditional hydroelastic models are segmented and use either a flexible backbone or flexible joints to introduce stiffness. This often results in an excellent description of the 2-node bending mode, but an increasing error for higher modes leads to stress inaccuracies. In this investigation, a fully elastic model of a catamaran is designed and produced for hydroelastic experiments. The advantages and limitations of the concept are identified, and the verification against structural models is presented.