FL
F. Laufer Schuh
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Connecting the Dots
Regulating circulation to strengthen local identity and foster social cohesion
Following the closing of its gas field, which induced earthquakes that caused harm to people and buildings over the years, the province of Groningen, through the program Nij Begun, is at a turning point, investing on tourism as a way of revitalizing its social and economic welfare. This new beginning (as Nij Begun suggests) requires a balance between increasing tourism and local community needs. Therefore, this project aims to propose the design of an activity center in the village of Winsum that uses tourism as a driver for socio-economic healing and social cohesion and that strengthens the local identity.
By means of a Research-by-design approach that combines theoretical studies and design experimentations through analytical, comparative, and representational tools, the project works upon hybridity, multiplicity, circulation and regionalist architecture to achieve its goals. In exploring an architecture of regionalism, the design departs from the specific characteristics of the building terrain, resulting on four buildings that frame different visuals of the landscape and, in some cases, reinterpret historical landscape formations. In the same respect, the design incorporates local and bio-based materials. A terracotta pathway connects the different buildings, creating a journey throughout the landscape that promotes the overlapping of paths of tourists and locals, generating spontaneous interactions between them.
Ultimately, the design demonstrates how architecture can go beyond merely accommodating functions, being in fact a powerful tool to strengthen economy and identity in vulnerable communities. It proves that contemporary regionalism can honour a landscape without replicating historical styles and that careful orchestration of circulation can foster social cohesion. ...
By means of a Research-by-design approach that combines theoretical studies and design experimentations through analytical, comparative, and representational tools, the project works upon hybridity, multiplicity, circulation and regionalist architecture to achieve its goals. In exploring an architecture of regionalism, the design departs from the specific characteristics of the building terrain, resulting on four buildings that frame different visuals of the landscape and, in some cases, reinterpret historical landscape formations. In the same respect, the design incorporates local and bio-based materials. A terracotta pathway connects the different buildings, creating a journey throughout the landscape that promotes the overlapping of paths of tourists and locals, generating spontaneous interactions between them.
Ultimately, the design demonstrates how architecture can go beyond merely accommodating functions, being in fact a powerful tool to strengthen economy and identity in vulnerable communities. It proves that contemporary regionalism can honour a landscape without replicating historical styles and that careful orchestration of circulation can foster social cohesion. ...
Following the closing of its gas field, which induced earthquakes that caused harm to people and buildings over the years, the province of Groningen, through the program Nij Begun, is at a turning point, investing on tourism as a way of revitalizing its social and economic welfare. This new beginning (as Nij Begun suggests) requires a balance between increasing tourism and local community needs. Therefore, this project aims to propose the design of an activity center in the village of Winsum that uses tourism as a driver for socio-economic healing and social cohesion and that strengthens the local identity.
By means of a Research-by-design approach that combines theoretical studies and design experimentations through analytical, comparative, and representational tools, the project works upon hybridity, multiplicity, circulation and regionalist architecture to achieve its goals. In exploring an architecture of regionalism, the design departs from the specific characteristics of the building terrain, resulting on four buildings that frame different visuals of the landscape and, in some cases, reinterpret historical landscape formations. In the same respect, the design incorporates local and bio-based materials. A terracotta pathway connects the different buildings, creating a journey throughout the landscape that promotes the overlapping of paths of tourists and locals, generating spontaneous interactions between them.
Ultimately, the design demonstrates how architecture can go beyond merely accommodating functions, being in fact a powerful tool to strengthen economy and identity in vulnerable communities. It proves that contemporary regionalism can honour a landscape without replicating historical styles and that careful orchestration of circulation can foster social cohesion.
By means of a Research-by-design approach that combines theoretical studies and design experimentations through analytical, comparative, and representational tools, the project works upon hybridity, multiplicity, circulation and regionalist architecture to achieve its goals. In exploring an architecture of regionalism, the design departs from the specific characteristics of the building terrain, resulting on four buildings that frame different visuals of the landscape and, in some cases, reinterpret historical landscape formations. In the same respect, the design incorporates local and bio-based materials. A terracotta pathway connects the different buildings, creating a journey throughout the landscape that promotes the overlapping of paths of tourists and locals, generating spontaneous interactions between them.
Ultimately, the design demonstrates how architecture can go beyond merely accommodating functions, being in fact a powerful tool to strengthen economy and identity in vulnerable communities. It proves that contemporary regionalism can honour a landscape without replicating historical styles and that careful orchestration of circulation can foster social cohesion.
Significant population displacements have been taking place for centuries, most of the time as a consequence of natural disasters, wars, persecution or economic challenges. In 2023, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees reported 110 million people forcibly displaced worldwide (UNHCR, 2023). Conflicts in one country rapidly affect others, mainly as a result of these displacements and the vulnerable situation in which people find themselves in such circumstances. Thus, upon arrival in foreign countries, asylum seekers rely on the support provided by means of so called arrival/reception infrastructures, which can be material or immaterial means of aid.
The Netherlands, a country that receives refugees since its years as a republic, faced many crises in this regard over the years and keeps dealing with the consequences of episodes of high influx of refugees until nowadays. So, the objective of this research is to answer the questions “How did the reception infrastructure evolve during the main refugee crises in the Netherlands since World War II?”, and “What are the challenges and gaps in the spatial reception infrastructure offered by the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA), considering the minimum standards required by the Common European Asylum System?”, by analysing and reflecting upon historical media, archival materials, and publicly available reports and articles on the news about the current physical conditions of reception facilities.
Even though the asylum seekers’ reception system gradually became more regulated and the infrastructure provided changed significantly over the years, inhumane conditions continue to take place. European policies that fail on taking individual basic necessities of refugees into account, and a lack of shelter places in the country demonstrate that the reception infrastructure does not comply with the ever changing numbers of asylum requests, resulting in extremely inhumane situations to happen over and over again. ...
The Netherlands, a country that receives refugees since its years as a republic, faced many crises in this regard over the years and keeps dealing with the consequences of episodes of high influx of refugees until nowadays. So, the objective of this research is to answer the questions “How did the reception infrastructure evolve during the main refugee crises in the Netherlands since World War II?”, and “What are the challenges and gaps in the spatial reception infrastructure offered by the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA), considering the minimum standards required by the Common European Asylum System?”, by analysing and reflecting upon historical media, archival materials, and publicly available reports and articles on the news about the current physical conditions of reception facilities.
Even though the asylum seekers’ reception system gradually became more regulated and the infrastructure provided changed significantly over the years, inhumane conditions continue to take place. European policies that fail on taking individual basic necessities of refugees into account, and a lack of shelter places in the country demonstrate that the reception infrastructure does not comply with the ever changing numbers of asylum requests, resulting in extremely inhumane situations to happen over and over again. ...
Significant population displacements have been taking place for centuries, most of the time as a consequence of natural disasters, wars, persecution or economic challenges. In 2023, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees reported 110 million people forcibly displaced worldwide (UNHCR, 2023). Conflicts in one country rapidly affect others, mainly as a result of these displacements and the vulnerable situation in which people find themselves in such circumstances. Thus, upon arrival in foreign countries, asylum seekers rely on the support provided by means of so called arrival/reception infrastructures, which can be material or immaterial means of aid.
The Netherlands, a country that receives refugees since its years as a republic, faced many crises in this regard over the years and keeps dealing with the consequences of episodes of high influx of refugees until nowadays. So, the objective of this research is to answer the questions “How did the reception infrastructure evolve during the main refugee crises in the Netherlands since World War II?”, and “What are the challenges and gaps in the spatial reception infrastructure offered by the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA), considering the minimum standards required by the Common European Asylum System?”, by analysing and reflecting upon historical media, archival materials, and publicly available reports and articles on the news about the current physical conditions of reception facilities.
Even though the asylum seekers’ reception system gradually became more regulated and the infrastructure provided changed significantly over the years, inhumane conditions continue to take place. European policies that fail on taking individual basic necessities of refugees into account, and a lack of shelter places in the country demonstrate that the reception infrastructure does not comply with the ever changing numbers of asylum requests, resulting in extremely inhumane situations to happen over and over again.
The Netherlands, a country that receives refugees since its years as a republic, faced many crises in this regard over the years and keeps dealing with the consequences of episodes of high influx of refugees until nowadays. So, the objective of this research is to answer the questions “How did the reception infrastructure evolve during the main refugee crises in the Netherlands since World War II?”, and “What are the challenges and gaps in the spatial reception infrastructure offered by the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA), considering the minimum standards required by the Common European Asylum System?”, by analysing and reflecting upon historical media, archival materials, and publicly available reports and articles on the news about the current physical conditions of reception facilities.
Even though the asylum seekers’ reception system gradually became more regulated and the infrastructure provided changed significantly over the years, inhumane conditions continue to take place. European policies that fail on taking individual basic necessities of refugees into account, and a lack of shelter places in the country demonstrate that the reception infrastructure does not comply with the ever changing numbers of asylum requests, resulting in extremely inhumane situations to happen over and over again.