Many speech coding strategies have been developed over the years, but comparing them has been convoluted due to the difficulty in disentangling brand-specific and patient-specific factors from strategy-specific factors that contribute to speech understanding. Here, we present a comparison with a ‘virtual’ patient, by comparing two strategies from two different manufacturers, Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) versus HiResolution Fidelity 120 (F120), running on two different implant systems in a computational model with the same anatomy and neural properties. We fitted both strategies to an expected T-level and C- or M-level based on the spike rate for each electrode contact’s allocated frequency (center electrode frequency) of the respective array. This paper highlights neural and electrical differences due to brand-specific characteristics such as pulse rate/channel, recruitment of adjacent electrodes, and presence of subthreshold pulses or interphase gaps. These differences lead to considerably different recruitment patterns of nerve fibers, while achieving the same total spike rates, i.e., loudness percepts. Also, loudness growth curves differ significantly between brands. The model is able to demonstrate considerable electrical and neural differences in the way loudness growth is achieved in CIs from different manufacturers. ... Read more