Salt marshes fronting coastal structures, such as seawalls and dikes, may offer important ecosystem-based coastal defence by reducing the wave loading and run-up levels during storms. We question (i) how the long-term salt marsh development in the Dutch Wadden Sea relates to the tidal-flat foreshore bathymetry and (ii) how the wave run-up onto dikes, which enhances the risk of dike failure, depends on foreshore bathymetry, the presence/absence of marshes, marsh vegetation properties, tidal range and wind exposure. We analysed 15 years of vegetation and bathymetry maps along the entire Dutch Wadden Sea coast, in combination with detailed process-based measurements at five locations during 3 years, to understand where salt marshes naturally form and what features determine their contribution to coastal protection. The horizontal extent of marshes along the dikes remained relatively stable over the past decade. The presence of marshes was associated with higher elevations of adjacent tidal flats (above ~0.5 m NAP), while landward-directed marsh retreat was associated with surface erosion of the fronting tidal flats. Wave run-up during storms was lower at sites with wider marshes and higher foreshore elevations. This was attributed to the marsh attenuation effect, which led to a reduction in wave heights at the dike toe. As the tidal range varies across the Dutch Wadden Sea, areas to the East with generally higher water levels experienced higher wave run-up. Synthesis and applications. We found that (i) marshes, where present, effectively protected the dikes from wave loading and (ii) the sites where marshes typically do not develop spontaneously were the most vulnerable to high wave run-up. This catch-22 problem implies that increasing reliance on nature-based coastal defences along soft-bottom coasts may require human interventions to stimulate marsh formation at the locations where it is most needed. Alternatively, ‘hard engineering’ solutions may remain necessary where implementing nature-based solutions are either too costly, unachievable, or at the expense of other ecological values, such as causing the loss of mudflats that are important for migratory birds.

Coastal vegetation is widely attributed to stabilize sediment. While most studies focused on how canopy causes flow reduction and thereby affects sediment dynamics, the role of roots and rhizomes on stabilizing the surface sediment has been less well studied. This study aims to quantify interactions between above- and belowground biomass of eelgrass (i.e., living Zostera marina plants and mimics) with surface sediment erosion (i.e., bed load and suspended load), under different hydrodynamic forcing that was created using a wave flume. Belowground biomass played an important role preventing bed-load erosion, by roughly halving the amount of sediment transported after being exposed to maximal orbital velocities of 27 cm s⁻¹, with and without canopy. Surprisingly, for suspended sediment transport, we found opposite effects. In the presence of eelgrass, the critical erosion threshold started at lower velocities than on bare sediment, including sand and mud treatments. Moreover, in muddy systems, such resuspension reduced the light level below the minimum requirement of Z. marina. This surprising result for sediment resuspension was ascribed to a too small eelgrass patch for reducing waves but rather showing enhanced turbulence and scouring at meadow edges. Overall, we conclude that the conservation of the existent eelgrass meadows with developed roots and rhizomes is important for the sediment stabilization and the meadow scale should be taken into account to decrease sediment resuspension.