WP

W. Peerbooms

info

Please Note

2 records found

Results from particle-resolved Direct numerical simulations are presented for dense suspensions of frictional non-colloidal spheres in viscous pressure-driven channel flow. The bulk solid volume fraction varies between ϕb=0.2 and 0.6, and the Coulomb friction coefficient is either μc=0 or 0.5. The main objectives are to unravel the influence of (1) ϕb and μc on the flow development time and of (2) heterogeneous shear on the steady-state suspension rheology. Starting from an initially homogeneous distribution, the particles show shear-induced migration toward the core until equilibrium is reached. The flow development time decays exponentially with increasing ϕbR, where ΦR is a friction-dependent reference bulk concentration beyond which particle contacts cause a rapid increase in the particle stress. The steady-state rheology is studied by means of the ‘viscous’ and ‘frictional’ rheology frameworks. Excluding the central core and wall regions, the data for the local relative suspension viscosity collapse onto a single curve as function of the normalized local concentration ϕ¯/ϕm, where ϕm is the friction-dependent maximum flowable packing fraction. The frictional rheology shows ‘subyielding’ at low viscous number Iv in the core region, where the macroscopic friction coefficient μ drops below the minimal value found for homogeneous shear flows. A modified frictional rheology model is presented that captures subyielding. Finally, a model is presented for ϕ¯/ϕmp as function of Iv, where ϕmp is a modified maximum flowable packing fraction. It captures both ‘overcompaction’ in the core beyond ϕm at high ϕb and maximum core concentrations below ϕm at lower ϕb. ...

Comparison of the viscous and frictional rheology descriptions

In the literature, two different frameworks exist for describing the rheology of solid/liquid suspensions: (1) the “viscous” framework in terms of the relative suspension viscosity, ηr, as a function of the reduced solid volume fraction, f=fm, with fm the maximum flowable packing fraction, and (2) the “frictional” framework in terms of a macroscopic friction coefficient, μ, as a function of the viscous number, Iv, defined as the ratio of the viscous shear to the wall-normal particle stress. Our goal is to compare the two different frameworks, focusing on the effect of friction between particles. We have conducted a particle-resolved direct numerical simulation study of a dense non-Brownian suspension of neutrally buoyant spheres in slow plane Couette flow. We varied the bulk solid volume fraction from fb ¼ 0:1 to 0.6 and considered three different Coulomb friction coefficients: μc ¼ 0, 0.2, and 0.39. We find that ηr scales well with f=fm, with fm obtained from fitting the Maron–Pierce correlation. We also find that μ scales well with Iv. Furthermore, we find a monotonic relation between f=fm and Iv, which depends only weakly on μc. Since ηr ¼ μ=Iv, we thus find that the two frameworks are largely equivalent and that both account implicitly for Coulomb friction. However, we find that the normal particle stress differences, N1 and N2, when normalized with the total shear stress and plotted against either f=fm or Iv, remain explicitly dependent on μc in a manner that is not yet fully understood. ...