H.S. Offerhaus
Please Note
2 records found
1
From R-loops to Genomes
Connecting Molecular CRISPR-Cas9 Kinetics to Genome Editing
This thesis uses biophysical modeling to translate understanding of Cas9’s molecular mechanisms to prediction of its genome editing activity in cells. Chapter 1 introduces CRISPR, outlining its origin as an immune system in bacteria and archaea, its transformation into a DNA editing toolkit, and the wide range of genetic engineering applications it has enabled. It discusses the main challenges to successful CRISPR applications, and explains how biophysical models can support gRNA selection and other design choices. Chapter 2 describes mathematically how Cas9 dynamics differ between cellfree experiments (in vitro) and living cells (in vivo) due to differences in Cas9 availability and the processes of target search and recognition. By connecting the two settings, the framework allows the findings of later chapters to be generalized across experimental and cellular conditions. Chapter 3 introduces CRISPRzip, a model of Cas9 target recognition that integrates the physics of gRNADNA interactions, and thus explains the variation in activity across gRNA and DNA sequences. Moreover, CRISPRzip incorporates the effects of Cas9 concentration and DNA twisting (supercoiling) on how Cas9 binds and cuts DNA. Because CRISPRzip adapts to gRNA sequence and to environment conditions like concentration and supercoiling, it provides a flexible basis for gRNA design even when the application setting deviates from the experiments used for training. Chapter 4 presents an experimental approach to quantify the effects of DNA supercoiling across thousands of DNA sequences. While these results can largely be explained by CRISPRzip, they also reveal a complex interplay between supercoiling and sequence that calls for further study. Chapter 5 extends the molecular description of Cas9 to the scale of the full genome. Using analytical models of target search and numerical predictions from CRISPRzip, it shows that prediction of ontarget and major offtarget activity does not require explicit consideration of the surrounding genome sequence under typical conditions. Also, it formulates a theory that connects different Cas9 delivery strategies and shows how to balance precision and efficiency in gene editing applications. Chapter 6 concludes the thesis by summarizing the main results and presenting an outlook towards biophysicssupported CRISPR activity prediction in cells
...
This thesis uses biophysical modeling to translate understanding of Cas9’s molecular mechanisms to prediction of its genome editing activity in cells. Chapter 1 introduces CRISPR, outlining its origin as an immune system in bacteria and archaea, its transformation into a DNA editing toolkit, and the wide range of genetic engineering applications it has enabled. It discusses the main challenges to successful CRISPR applications, and explains how biophysical models can support gRNA selection and other design choices. Chapter 2 describes mathematically how Cas9 dynamics differ between cellfree experiments (in vitro) and living cells (in vivo) due to differences in Cas9 availability and the processes of target search and recognition. By connecting the two settings, the framework allows the findings of later chapters to be generalized across experimental and cellular conditions. Chapter 3 introduces CRISPRzip, a model of Cas9 target recognition that integrates the physics of gRNADNA interactions, and thus explains the variation in activity across gRNA and DNA sequences. Moreover, CRISPRzip incorporates the effects of Cas9 concentration and DNA twisting (supercoiling) on how Cas9 binds and cuts DNA. Because CRISPRzip adapts to gRNA sequence and to environment conditions like concentration and supercoiling, it provides a flexible basis for gRNA design even when the application setting deviates from the experiments used for training. Chapter 4 presents an experimental approach to quantify the effects of DNA supercoiling across thousands of DNA sequences. While these results can largely be explained by CRISPRzip, they also reveal a complex interplay between supercoiling and sequence that calls for further study. Chapter 5 extends the molecular description of Cas9 to the scale of the full genome. Using analytical models of target search and numerical predictions from CRISPRzip, it shows that prediction of ontarget and major offtarget activity does not require explicit consideration of the surrounding genome sequence under typical conditions. Also, it formulates a theory that connects different Cas9 delivery strategies and shows how to balance precision and efficiency in gene editing applications. Chapter 6 concludes the thesis by summarizing the main results and presenting an outlook towards biophysicssupported CRISPR activity prediction in cells
CRISPR-Cas systems have widely been adopted as genome editing tools, with two frequently employed Cas nucleases being SpyCas9 and LbCas12a. Although both nucleases use RNA guides to find and cleave target DNA sites, the two enzymes differ in terms of protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) requirements, guide architecture and cleavage mechanism. In the last years, rational engineering led to the creation of PAM-relaxed variants SpRYCas9 and impLbCas12a to broaden the targetable DNA space. By employing their catalytically inactive variants (dCas9/dCas12a), we quantified how the protein-specific characteristics impact the target search process. To allow quantification, we fused these nucleases to the photoactivatable fluorescent protein PAmCherry2.1 and performed single-particle tracking in cells of Escherichia coli. From our tracking analysis, we derived kinetic parameters for each nuclease with a non-targeting RNA guide, strongly suggesting that interrogation of DNA by LbdCas12a variants proceeds faster than that of SpydCas9. In the presence of a targeting RNA guide, both simulations and imaging of cells confirmed that LbdCas12a variants are faster and more efficient in finding a specific target site. Our work demonstrates the trade-off of relaxing PAM requirements in SpydCas9 and LbdCas12a using a powerful framework, which can be applied to other nucleases to quantify their DNA target search.