J. Iori
Please Note
12 records found
1
Control co-design (CCD) represents an integrated approach to simultaneously optimize the physical design and control strategies of wind turbines, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce costs. This review explores the current state of CCD, addressing advancements in methodologies, challenges in defining and quantifying couplings, and limitations in existing applications. While CCD has demonstrated potential in improving wind turbine design, gaps remain in standardizing coupling metrics and expanding its applicability to broader design problems. By establishing robust methodologies and addressing current challenges, CCD can become a transformative approach in advancing sustainable and cost-effective wind energy systems.
However, estimating the power production is based on forecast information and thus includes uncertainties in the storage dispatch. These uncertainties reduce the performance of the power plant, both in terms of revenues from the electricity markets and reliability of electricity supply. This challenge becomes more important when the hybrid power plant includes a high share of wind energy, since wind power is particularly difficult to forecast.
Previous studies in the field examined the impact of wind power forecast uncertainties on hybrid power plant performance under various case studies. However, most studies primarily evaluate the performance of the dispatch under uncertainty at the level of performance metrics such as revenues. How input uncertainty translates into realized operational behavior once decisions are implemented is rarely examined in detail. Results are often reported as single expected values, without analyzing their variability. The same dispatch strategy can produce a wide range of realized outcomes when uncertain inputs deviate from forecasts, but that dispersion is rarely quantified.
This work aims to understand how power forecast uncertainties propagate into battery dispatch decisions. In particular, we identify the characteristics of the most impactful forecast uncertainty on the system operation.
We study a wind farm coupled with a storage system located in Spain. A large number of wind power forecast scenarios are generated using the SARIMAX method and used to evaluate the forecast uncertainty characteristics. Each forecast scenario is used to simulate the dispatch operation of the hybrid power plant to maximize revenues on the day-ahead market. The analysis of the ensemble of dispatch scenarios shows that deviations in storage operations are systematically caused by the same mechanisms. We classify them into four types: (i) missed discharge due to under-forecasting, (ii) missed charge due to over-forecasting, (iii) false anticipation due to under-forecasting, and (iv) false anticipation due to over-forecasting. Our study further shows that the first type is the most common and accounts for the greatest revenue losses. ...
However, estimating the power production is based on forecast information and thus includes uncertainties in the storage dispatch. These uncertainties reduce the performance of the power plant, both in terms of revenues from the electricity markets and reliability of electricity supply. This challenge becomes more important when the hybrid power plant includes a high share of wind energy, since wind power is particularly difficult to forecast.
Previous studies in the field examined the impact of wind power forecast uncertainties on hybrid power plant performance under various case studies. However, most studies primarily evaluate the performance of the dispatch under uncertainty at the level of performance metrics such as revenues. How input uncertainty translates into realized operational behavior once decisions are implemented is rarely examined in detail. Results are often reported as single expected values, without analyzing their variability. The same dispatch strategy can produce a wide range of realized outcomes when uncertain inputs deviate from forecasts, but that dispersion is rarely quantified.
This work aims to understand how power forecast uncertainties propagate into battery dispatch decisions. In particular, we identify the characteristics of the most impactful forecast uncertainty on the system operation.
We study a wind farm coupled with a storage system located in Spain. A large number of wind power forecast scenarios are generated using the SARIMAX method and used to evaluate the forecast uncertainty characteristics. Each forecast scenario is used to simulate the dispatch operation of the hybrid power plant to maximize revenues on the day-ahead market. The analysis of the ensemble of dispatch scenarios shows that deviations in storage operations are systematically caused by the same mechanisms. We classify them into four types: (i) missed discharge due to under-forecasting, (ii) missed charge due to over-forecasting, (iii) false anticipation due to under-forecasting, and (iv) false anticipation due to over-forecasting. Our study further shows that the first type is the most common and accounts for the greatest revenue losses.
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a linear quadratic regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control co-design optimization while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to using control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft–soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a taller tower with reduced mass. ...
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a linear quadratic regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control co-design optimization while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to using control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft–soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a taller tower with reduced mass.
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a Linear Quadratic Regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal levelized cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control-co design optimization, while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to use control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft-soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a higher tower with reduced mass. ...
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a Linear Quadratic Regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal levelized cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control-co design optimization, while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to use control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft-soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a higher tower with reduced mass.
The optimal blade design is described with a focus on the impact of the coupling
between control and structure introduced in the analysis model. The aerodynamic model for the loads is based on the Blade Element Momentum theory. The structural model for the blade is based on the nite element method and on a simplied cross section analysis of the internal blade structure. The optimization problem aims at reducing the mass of the blade within constraints on the power, the tip displacement and the pitch angle, by varying the chord and the control parameters. The optimization with the NAND approach is run using a Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm whereas the Interior-point algorithm is used for the SAND approach.
This study shows that adding the control strategy as a design variable allows a relaxation of the structural constraints and further mass reduction. The SAND approach was found to be less robust and less efficient than the NAND approach. ...
The optimal blade design is described with a focus on the impact of the coupling
between control and structure introduced in the analysis model. The aerodynamic model for the loads is based on the Blade Element Momentum theory. The structural model for the blade is based on the nite element method and on a simplied cross section analysis of the internal blade structure. The optimization problem aims at reducing the mass of the blade within constraints on the power, the tip displacement and the pitch angle, by varying the chord and the control parameters. The optimization with the NAND approach is run using a Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm whereas the Interior-point algorithm is used for the SAND approach.
This study shows that adding the control strategy as a design variable allows a relaxation of the structural constraints and further mass reduction. The SAND approach was found to be less robust and less efficient than the NAND approach.