J. Iori
Please Note
10 records found
1
Control co-design (CCD) represents an integrated approach to simultaneously optimize the physical design and control strategies of wind turbines, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce costs. This review explores the current state of CCD, addressing advancements in methodologies, challenges in defining and quantifying couplings, and limitations in existing applications. While CCD has demonstrated potential in improving wind turbine design, gaps remain in standardizing coupling metrics and expanding its applicability to broader design problems. By establishing robust methodologies and addressing current challenges, CCD can become a transformative approach in advancing sustainable and cost-effective wind energy systems.
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a linear quadratic regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control co-design optimization while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to using control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft–soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a taller tower with reduced mass. ...
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a linear quadratic regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control co-design optimization while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to using control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft–soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a taller tower with reduced mass.
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a Linear Quadratic Regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal levelized cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control-co design optimization, while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to use control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft-soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a higher tower with reduced mass. ...
The performance of the method is evaluated on a tower design optimization problem, where fatigue load constraints are a major driver, and using a Linear Quadratic Regulator targeting fatigue load alleviation. We use the gradient-based multi-disciplinary optimization framework Cp-max. Fatigue damage is evaluated with time-domain simulations corresponding to the certification standards. The estimation method applied to the optimal tower mass and optimal levelized cost of energy show good agreement with the results of the control-co design optimization, while using only a fraction of the computational effort.
Our results additionally show that there may be little benefit to use control co-design in the presence of an active frequency constraint. However, for a soft-soft tower configuration where the resonance can be avoided with active control, using control co-design results in a higher tower with reduced mass.
The optimal blade design is described with a focus on the impact of the coupling
between control and structure introduced in the analysis model. The aerodynamic model for the loads is based on the Blade Element Momentum theory. The structural model for the blade is based on the nite element method and on a simplied cross section analysis of the internal blade structure. The optimization problem aims at reducing the mass of the blade within constraints on the power, the tip displacement and the pitch angle, by varying the chord and the control parameters. The optimization with the NAND approach is run using a Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm whereas the Interior-point algorithm is used for the SAND approach.
This study shows that adding the control strategy as a design variable allows a relaxation of the structural constraints and further mass reduction. The SAND approach was found to be less robust and less efficient than the NAND approach. ...
The optimal blade design is described with a focus on the impact of the coupling
between control and structure introduced in the analysis model. The aerodynamic model for the loads is based on the Blade Element Momentum theory. The structural model for the blade is based on the nite element method and on a simplied cross section analysis of the internal blade structure. The optimization problem aims at reducing the mass of the blade within constraints on the power, the tip displacement and the pitch angle, by varying the chord and the control parameters. The optimization with the NAND approach is run using a Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm whereas the Interior-point algorithm is used for the SAND approach.
This study shows that adding the control strategy as a design variable allows a relaxation of the structural constraints and further mass reduction. The SAND approach was found to be less robust and less efficient than the NAND approach.