Fontan patients require a balanced hepatic blood flow distribution (HFD) to prevent pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. Currently, HFD is quantified by tracking Fontan conduit flow, assuming hepatic venous (HV) flow to be uniformly distributed within the Fontan conduit. However, this assumption may be unvalid leading to inaccuracies in HFD quantification with potential clinical impact. The aim of this study was to (i) assess the mixing of HV flow and inferior vena caval (IVC) flow within the Fontan conduit and (ii) quantify HFD by directly tracking HV flow and quantitatively comparing results with the conventional approach. Patient-specific, time-resolved computational fluid dynamic models of 15 total cavopulmonary connections were generated, including the HV and subhepatic IVC. Mixing of HV and IVC flow, on a scale between 0 (no mixing) and 1 (perfect mixing), was assessed at the caudal and cranial Fontan conduit. HFD was quantified by tracking particles from the caudal (HFDcaudal conduit) and cranial (HFDcranial conduit) conduit and from the hepatic veins (HFDHV). HV flow was non-uniformly distributed at both the caudal (mean mixing 0.66 ± 0.13) and cranial (mean 0.79 ± 0.11) level within the Fontan conduit. On a cohort level, differences in HFD between methods were significant but small; HFDHV (51.0 ± 20.6%) versus HFDcaudal conduit (48.2 ± 21.9%, p = 0.033) or HFDcranial conduit (48.0 ± 21.9%, p = 0.044). However, individual absolute differences of 8.2-14.9% in HFD were observed in 4/15 patients. HV flow is non-uniformly distributed within the Fontan conduit. Substantial individual inaccuracies in HFD quantification were observed in a subset of patients with potential clinical impact.@en

OBJECTIVES: To date, it is not known if 16–20-mm extracardiac conduits are outgrown during somatic growth from childhood to adolescence. This study aims to determine total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) haemodynamics in adolescent Fontan patients at rest and during simulated exercise and to assess the relationship between conduit size and haemodynamics. METHODS: Patient-specific, magnetic resonance imaging-based computational fluid dynamic models of the TCPC were performed in 51 extracardiac Fontan patients with 16–20-mm conduits. Power loss, pressure gradient and normalized resistance were quantified in rest and during simulated exercise. The cross-sectional area (CSA) (mean and minimum) of the vessels of the TCPC was determined and normalized for flow rate (mm2/l/min). Peak (predicted) oxygen uptake was assessed. RESULTS: The median age was 16.2 years (Q1–Q3 14.0–18.2). The normalized mean conduit CSA was 35–73% smaller compared to the inferior and superior vena cava, hepatic veins and left/right pulmonary artery (all P < 0.001). The median TCPC pressure gradient was 0.7 mmHg (Q1–Q3 0.5–0.8) and 2.0 (Q1–Q3 1.4–2.6) during rest and simulated exercise, respectively. A moderate–strong inverse nonlinear relationship was present between normalized mean conduit CSA and TCPC haemodynamics in rest and exercise. TCPC pressure gradients of >_1.0 at rest and >_3.0 mmHg during simulated exercise were observed in patients with a conduit CSA <_ 45 mm2/l/min and favourable haemodynamics (<1 mmHg during both rest and exercise) in conduits >_125 mm2/l/min. Normalized TCPC resistance correlated with (predicted) peak oxygen uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Extracardiac conduits of 16–20 mm have become relatively undersized in most adolescent Fontan patients leading to suboptimal haemodynamics.@en

OBJECTIVES: Adequacy of 16-20mm extracardiac conduits for adolescent Fontan patients remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate conduit adequacy using the inferior vena cava (IVC)-conduit velocity mismatch factor along the respiratory cycle. METHODS: Real-time 2D flow MRI was prospectively acquired in 50 extracardiac (16-20mm conduits) Fontan patients (mean age 16.9 ± 4.5 years) at the subhepatic IVC, conduit and superior vena cava. Hepatic venous flow was determined by subtracting IVC flow from conduit flow. The cross-sectional area (CSA) was reported for each vessel. Mean flow and velocity was calculated during the average respiratory cycle, inspiration and expiration. The IVC-conduit velocity mismatch factor was determined as follows: Vconduit/VIVC, where V is the mean velocity. RESULTS: Median conduit CSA and IVC CSA were 221 mm2 (Q1-Q3 201-255) and 244 mm2 (Q1-Q3 203-265), respectively. From the IVC towards the conduit, flow rates increased significantly due to the entry of hepatic venous flow (IVC 1.9, Q1-Q3 1.5-2.2) versus conduit (3.3, Q1-Q3 2.5-4.0 l/min, P < 0.001). Consequently, mean velocity significantly increased (IVC 12 (Q1-Q3 11-14 cm/s) versus conduit 25 (Q1-Q3 17-31 cm/s), P < 0.001), resulting in a median IVC-conduit velocity mismatch of 1.8 (Q1-Q3 1.5-2.4), further augmenting during inspiration (median 2.3, Q1-Q3 1.8-3.0). IVC-conduit mismatch was inversely related to measured conduit size and positively correlated with conduit flow. The normalized IVC-conduit velocity mismatch factor during expiration and the entire respiratory cycle correlated with peak VO2 (r = -0.37, P = 0.014 and r = -0.31, P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Important blood flow accelerations are observed from the IVC towards the conduit in adolescent Fontan patients, which is related to peak VO2. This study, therefore, raises concerns that implanted 16-20mm conduits have become undersized for older Fontan patients and future studies should clarify its effect on long-term outcome. @en