BB
B. Bischoff Tulleken
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Influence of film formers on magnetite properties under water-steam cycle conditions
The influence on acidic flow-accelerated corrosion and magnetite surface charge in conditions pertinent to condensate, feedwater and boiler systems
Master thesis
(2021)
-
B. Bischoff Tulleken, H.L.F.M. Spanjers, R.E.F. Lindeboom, J.M.C. Mol, D.H. Moed, A.R.D. Verliefde, S. Vidojkovic
Corrosion and fouling are considered major factors affecting the performance of water-steam cycles (WSC). Flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC), present in feed and condensate systems, is a well known corrosion mechanism, eroding and dissolving the protective magnetite layers. Fouling of the boiler, by suspended magnetite particles, is partly controlled by forces arising due to surface charging. Film forming amines (FFA) are gaining acceptance as means to control FAC. However, its performance in low pH regions is unknown. In addition, despite FFA being a surfactant, its effect on the colloidal magnetite surface charge and point of zero charge (pzc) are unknown. This research set out to determine the effect
of FFAs on the formation of a protective magnetite layer and its resistance against acidic FAC, and to determine the effect of FFAs on the surface charge of colloidal magnetite. This study focused on two FFAs, Octadecylamine (ODA) and Oleyl Propylenediamine (OLDA). In 48h 230-250 ºC immersion corrosion tests magnetite layers were formed on C1010 coupons, inside a high pressure high temperature autoclave under different treatments: untreated (blank), 2ppm ODA and 2ppm Ammonia, 2ppm OLDA and 2ppm Ammonia, and only 2ppm Ammonia. 48h 150 ºC re-immersion corrosion tests were performed to test the magnetite layer performance under acidic (acetate 0.08ppm) FAC. After the corrosion tests, the layers were verified using XRD, EDS + SEM and Weigh-loss measurements. Potentiometric titrations were employed to measure the proton induced surface charge of magnetite particles (10g/L) at an ionic strength of 0.01, and 0.1 mol/kg (KNO3) in the presence or absence of ODA, or OLDA (2ppm) over a wide pH range, at 25, and 150 ºC. This gave the magnetite surface charge density curves. The pzc was determined using the inflection point of titrations (pHinfl) and common intersection point (pHcip). XRD confirmed the presence of magnetite layers on all coupons after the immersion and re-immersion tests. The SEM measured magnetite layer decrease after the re-immersion tests was: 19.1%, 14.5%, 8.6%, and 23.3% for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. Weight loss determined corrosion rates taken over both immersion and re-immersion tests were: 0.070, 0.057, 0.060, and 0.073 mm/y for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. All magnetite surface charge density curves were unaffected by the presence of ODA, and OLDA, except for ODA at 0.1 mol/kg KNO3 and 25 ºC, which resulted in a raised/neutralized surface charge density curve in the alkaline pH region. Magnetite layers formed under ODA, and OLDA additions were smoother, thinner, and more uniform compared to layers formed under an ammonia only chemistry, and blank chemistry. Layers formed under the ODA, and OLDA chemistries were better resistant against acidic FAC and offered better protection, in terms of corrosion rate. At the applied concentration ratio, and ionic strength of 0.01M, ODA, and OLDA did not affect the magnetite colloid surface charge over pH. However, both caused magnetite particles to agglomerate. At higher ionic strengths of 0.1M, ODA neutralized the magnetite surface charge in the alkaline region. ...
of FFAs on the formation of a protective magnetite layer and its resistance against acidic FAC, and to determine the effect of FFAs on the surface charge of colloidal magnetite. This study focused on two FFAs, Octadecylamine (ODA) and Oleyl Propylenediamine (OLDA). In 48h 230-250 ºC immersion corrosion tests magnetite layers were formed on C1010 coupons, inside a high pressure high temperature autoclave under different treatments: untreated (blank), 2ppm ODA and 2ppm Ammonia, 2ppm OLDA and 2ppm Ammonia, and only 2ppm Ammonia. 48h 150 ºC re-immersion corrosion tests were performed to test the magnetite layer performance under acidic (acetate 0.08ppm) FAC. After the corrosion tests, the layers were verified using XRD, EDS + SEM and Weigh-loss measurements. Potentiometric titrations were employed to measure the proton induced surface charge of magnetite particles (10g/L) at an ionic strength of 0.01, and 0.1 mol/kg (KNO3) in the presence or absence of ODA, or OLDA (2ppm) over a wide pH range, at 25, and 150 ºC. This gave the magnetite surface charge density curves. The pzc was determined using the inflection point of titrations (pHinfl) and common intersection point (pHcip). XRD confirmed the presence of magnetite layers on all coupons after the immersion and re-immersion tests. The SEM measured magnetite layer decrease after the re-immersion tests was: 19.1%, 14.5%, 8.6%, and 23.3% for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. Weight loss determined corrosion rates taken over both immersion and re-immersion tests were: 0.070, 0.057, 0.060, and 0.073 mm/y for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. All magnetite surface charge density curves were unaffected by the presence of ODA, and OLDA, except for ODA at 0.1 mol/kg KNO3 and 25 ºC, which resulted in a raised/neutralized surface charge density curve in the alkaline pH region. Magnetite layers formed under ODA, and OLDA additions were smoother, thinner, and more uniform compared to layers formed under an ammonia only chemistry, and blank chemistry. Layers formed under the ODA, and OLDA chemistries were better resistant against acidic FAC and offered better protection, in terms of corrosion rate. At the applied concentration ratio, and ionic strength of 0.01M, ODA, and OLDA did not affect the magnetite colloid surface charge over pH. However, both caused magnetite particles to agglomerate. At higher ionic strengths of 0.1M, ODA neutralized the magnetite surface charge in the alkaline region. ...
Corrosion and fouling are considered major factors affecting the performance of water-steam cycles (WSC). Flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC), present in feed and condensate systems, is a well known corrosion mechanism, eroding and dissolving the protective magnetite layers. Fouling of the boiler, by suspended magnetite particles, is partly controlled by forces arising due to surface charging. Film forming amines (FFA) are gaining acceptance as means to control FAC. However, its performance in low pH regions is unknown. In addition, despite FFA being a surfactant, its effect on the colloidal magnetite surface charge and point of zero charge (pzc) are unknown. This research set out to determine the effect
of FFAs on the formation of a protective magnetite layer and its resistance against acidic FAC, and to determine the effect of FFAs on the surface charge of colloidal magnetite. This study focused on two FFAs, Octadecylamine (ODA) and Oleyl Propylenediamine (OLDA). In 48h 230-250 ºC immersion corrosion tests magnetite layers were formed on C1010 coupons, inside a high pressure high temperature autoclave under different treatments: untreated (blank), 2ppm ODA and 2ppm Ammonia, 2ppm OLDA and 2ppm Ammonia, and only 2ppm Ammonia. 48h 150 ºC re-immersion corrosion tests were performed to test the magnetite layer performance under acidic (acetate 0.08ppm) FAC. After the corrosion tests, the layers were verified using XRD, EDS + SEM and Weigh-loss measurements. Potentiometric titrations were employed to measure the proton induced surface charge of magnetite particles (10g/L) at an ionic strength of 0.01, and 0.1 mol/kg (KNO3) in the presence or absence of ODA, or OLDA (2ppm) over a wide pH range, at 25, and 150 ºC. This gave the magnetite surface charge density curves. The pzc was determined using the inflection point of titrations (pHinfl) and common intersection point (pHcip). XRD confirmed the presence of magnetite layers on all coupons after the immersion and re-immersion tests. The SEM measured magnetite layer decrease after the re-immersion tests was: 19.1%, 14.5%, 8.6%, and 23.3% for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. Weight loss determined corrosion rates taken over both immersion and re-immersion tests were: 0.070, 0.057, 0.060, and 0.073 mm/y for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. All magnetite surface charge density curves were unaffected by the presence of ODA, and OLDA, except for ODA at 0.1 mol/kg KNO3 and 25 ºC, which resulted in a raised/neutralized surface charge density curve in the alkaline pH region. Magnetite layers formed under ODA, and OLDA additions were smoother, thinner, and more uniform compared to layers formed under an ammonia only chemistry, and blank chemistry. Layers formed under the ODA, and OLDA chemistries were better resistant against acidic FAC and offered better protection, in terms of corrosion rate. At the applied concentration ratio, and ionic strength of 0.01M, ODA, and OLDA did not affect the magnetite colloid surface charge over pH. However, both caused magnetite particles to agglomerate. At higher ionic strengths of 0.1M, ODA neutralized the magnetite surface charge in the alkaline region.
of FFAs on the formation of a protective magnetite layer and its resistance against acidic FAC, and to determine the effect of FFAs on the surface charge of colloidal magnetite. This study focused on two FFAs, Octadecylamine (ODA) and Oleyl Propylenediamine (OLDA). In 48h 230-250 ºC immersion corrosion tests magnetite layers were formed on C1010 coupons, inside a high pressure high temperature autoclave under different treatments: untreated (blank), 2ppm ODA and 2ppm Ammonia, 2ppm OLDA and 2ppm Ammonia, and only 2ppm Ammonia. 48h 150 ºC re-immersion corrosion tests were performed to test the magnetite layer performance under acidic (acetate 0.08ppm) FAC. After the corrosion tests, the layers were verified using XRD, EDS + SEM and Weigh-loss measurements. Potentiometric titrations were employed to measure the proton induced surface charge of magnetite particles (10g/L) at an ionic strength of 0.01, and 0.1 mol/kg (KNO3) in the presence or absence of ODA, or OLDA (2ppm) over a wide pH range, at 25, and 150 ºC. This gave the magnetite surface charge density curves. The pzc was determined using the inflection point of titrations (pHinfl) and common intersection point (pHcip). XRD confirmed the presence of magnetite layers on all coupons after the immersion and re-immersion tests. The SEM measured magnetite layer decrease after the re-immersion tests was: 19.1%, 14.5%, 8.6%, and 23.3% for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. Weight loss determined corrosion rates taken over both immersion and re-immersion tests were: 0.070, 0.057, 0.060, and 0.073 mm/y for blank, ODA, OLDA, and ammonia treatment respectively. All magnetite surface charge density curves were unaffected by the presence of ODA, and OLDA, except for ODA at 0.1 mol/kg KNO3 and 25 ºC, which resulted in a raised/neutralized surface charge density curve in the alkaline pH region. Magnetite layers formed under ODA, and OLDA additions were smoother, thinner, and more uniform compared to layers formed under an ammonia only chemistry, and blank chemistry. Layers formed under the ODA, and OLDA chemistries were better resistant against acidic FAC and offered better protection, in terms of corrosion rate. At the applied concentration ratio, and ionic strength of 0.01M, ODA, and OLDA did not affect the magnetite colloid surface charge over pH. However, both caused magnetite particles to agglomerate. At higher ionic strengths of 0.1M, ODA neutralized the magnetite surface charge in the alkaline region.
Retrofitting Stormwater Ponds to Infiltration Ponds
A framework for the City of Cape Town
Student report
(2020)
-
Juliette Kool, Stijn Muntjewerff, Roos Goedhart, Floor Crispijn, Ben Bischoff Tulleken, Sebastian Durry, Luuk Rietveld, Thom Bogaard, Kevin Winter
Cape Town is a city with over four million people and a growing population. Due to three consecutive dry summers as a result of climate change, a growing population and an increased per capita water demand, the city’s main water supply was nearly depleted. Cape Town depends for 98% on surface water stored in dammed reservoirs, which is replenished by rainfall. There is a temporal mismatch between water availability and peak demand, and thus harvesting rainfall can be potentially become an additional source of water. Cape Town’s urban drainage system has 737 detention ponds, which are used to attenuate flooding in case of heavy rain events. These ponds can be used to harvest the stormwater and store it in the Cape Flats aquifer using managed aquifer recharge for seasonal availability. The complexity of retrofitting stormwater ponds into infiltration ponds calls for a systematic approach. This research offers a retrofitting framework for the context of Cape Town. The framework can be used to determine suitable detention ponds to allow managed aquifer recharge via infiltrating stormwater, and to retrofit these detention ponds into infiltration ponds. The framework consists of three phases; spatial assessment, physical assessment and conceptual design. It is highly flexible in usage due to the fact that every phase can be used separately. Additionally, the framework can be extended to include important socio-economic aspects. Following the framework standardizes the procedure of obtaining data on individual ponds, which allows for objective comparison in assessing their suitability for infiltration.
...
Cape Town is a city with over four million people and a growing population. Due to three consecutive dry summers as a result of climate change, a growing population and an increased per capita water demand, the city’s main water supply was nearly depleted. Cape Town depends for 98% on surface water stored in dammed reservoirs, which is replenished by rainfall. There is a temporal mismatch between water availability and peak demand, and thus harvesting rainfall can be potentially become an additional source of water. Cape Town’s urban drainage system has 737 detention ponds, which are used to attenuate flooding in case of heavy rain events. These ponds can be used to harvest the stormwater and store it in the Cape Flats aquifer using managed aquifer recharge for seasonal availability. The complexity of retrofitting stormwater ponds into infiltration ponds calls for a systematic approach. This research offers a retrofitting framework for the context of Cape Town. The framework can be used to determine suitable detention ponds to allow managed aquifer recharge via infiltrating stormwater, and to retrofit these detention ponds into infiltration ponds. The framework consists of three phases; spatial assessment, physical assessment and conceptual design. It is highly flexible in usage due to the fact that every phase can be used separately. Additionally, the framework can be extended to include important socio-economic aspects. Following the framework standardizes the procedure of obtaining data on individual ponds, which allows for objective comparison in assessing their suitability for infiltration.