<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
Developing creative solutions to improve our surroundings is a key 21st-century competency. Design & Technology (D&T) education presents valuable opportunities to teach creativity as a skill. However, the ill-defined and context-dependent nature of design problems often makes it challenging for educators to adequately evaluate the creativity demonstrated in pupils’ solutions. Comparative judgment, which does not rely on a predetermined set of evaluative criteria, offers an alternative approach. In this study, we leveraged this method to investigate how 20 industrial design students, acting as judges, holistically assessed design ideas and prototypes produced by 201 pupils aged 10 to 14 in the Netherlands. Although creativity is acknowledged as central to design quality, it is not prioritized in many current D&T projects. To address this gap, we deliberately focused on evaluating the creativity evident in pupils’ designs. We further explored how judges’ evaluative considerations, coded as criteria, shifted from the beginning to the end of the comparative judgment process. Our findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses added to our understanding of the multifaceted process of evaluating creativity and provided practical insights into using comparative judgment as an assessment tool in design education.
...
Developing creative solutions to improve our surroundings is a key 21st-century competency. Design & Technology (D&T) education presents valuable opportunities to teach creativity as a skill. However, the ill-defined and context-dependent nature of design problems often makes it challenging for educators to adequately evaluate the creativity demonstrated in pupils’ solutions. Comparative judgment, which does not rely on a predetermined set of evaluative criteria, offers an alternative approach. In this study, we leveraged this method to investigate how 20 industrial design students, acting as judges, holistically assessed design ideas and prototypes produced by 201 pupils aged 10 to 14 in the Netherlands. Although creativity is acknowledged as central to design quality, it is not prioritized in many current D&T projects. To address this gap, we deliberately focused on evaluating the creativity evident in pupils’ designs. We further explored how judges’ evaluative considerations, coded as criteria, shifted from the beginning to the end of the comparative judgment process. Our findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses added to our understanding of the multifaceted process of evaluating creativity and provided practical insights into using comparative judgment as an assessment tool in design education.
Review(2024)
-
Ergi Bufasi, Ting Jun Lin, Jeroen Spandaw, Brian Bowe, Colm O'Kane, Gavin Duffy, Marianna Pagkratidou, Jeffrey Buckley, Ursa Benedicic, Marten Westerhof, Rohit Mishra, Dace Namsone, Inese Dudareva, Sheryl Sorby, Lena Gumaelius, Remke M. Klapwijk
Extensive research has established that spatial ability is a crucial factor for achieving success in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). However, challenges that educators encounter while teaching spatial skills remain uncertain. The purpose of this study is to develop a research framework that examines the interrelationships, barriers, and enablers amongst various educational components, including schools, teachers, students, classrooms, and training programs, that are encountered when teaching for spatial ability development. A thorough examination of international research, in combination with a detailed review of the primary Science and Mathematics curricula in Ireland, Latvia, Sweden, and the Netherlands, is undertaken to acquire a more concentrated comprehension of the incorporation of spatial components in the curriculum. The review seeks to establish the fundamental factors that enable or hinder teachers in terms of curriculum, pedagogy, pedagogical content knowledge, and spatialized classroom practices.
...
Extensive research has established that spatial ability is a crucial factor for achieving success in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). However, challenges that educators encounter while teaching spatial skills remain uncertain. The purpose of this study is to develop a research framework that examines the interrelationships, barriers, and enablers amongst various educational components, including schools, teachers, students, classrooms, and training programs, that are encountered when teaching for spatial ability development. A thorough examination of international research, in combination with a detailed review of the primary Science and Mathematics curricula in Ireland, Latvia, Sweden, and the Netherlands, is undertaken to acquire a more concentrated comprehension of the incorporation of spatial components in the curriculum. The review seeks to establish the fundamental factors that enable or hinder teachers in terms of curriculum, pedagogy, pedagogical content knowledge, and spatialized classroom practices.
