This research paper investigates the evolution and societal impact of late 20th-century street art through the works of Keith Haring and Banksy. It explores how their art reflects the socio-political contexts of their time, transforming graffiti from a stigmatized act of vandalis
...
This research paper investigates the evolution and societal impact of late 20th-century street art through the works of Keith Haring and Banksy. It explores how their art reflects the socio-political contexts of their time, transforming graffiti from a stigmatized act of vandalism into a globally recognized art form. Haring’s vibrant, community-driven murals and Banksy’s provocative, politically charged stencils are analyzed to highlight their distinct yet complementary approaches. The study examines their engagement with public spaces, addressing issues such as AIDS awareness, drug abuse, inequality, and war, while navigating the tension between legality and artistic expression. By employing visual, contextual, and comparative analyses, the paper underscores how both artists redefined public art as a platform for activism and social commentary. Despite their contrasting styles—Haring’s openness versus Banksy’s anonymity—their shared commitment to democratizing art and challenging societal norms is evident. This research contributes to the ongoing debate over graffiti as art or vandalism, illustrating how Haring and Banksy’s works bridged the gap between outsider art and mainstream acceptance. Ultimately, the paper highlights street art’s transformative power in reshaping urban spaces and fostering dialogue on critical social issues.