This paper adopts a qualitative research approach, employing visual and contextual analysis of Brighton Pavilion and its Indian architectural inspirations. The study delves into the historical and cultural origins of the Pavillion's design elements, such as domes, minarets, chatris, arches, etc., and examines their reinterpretation within the European context. By analysing the building through a comparative perspective, the study contrasts these elements with their counterparts in Indian architecture, drawing examples from Mughal and Rajput architecture.
While most of the studies have examined the Brighton Pavillion’s architectural hybridity or its symbolic function within the British royal interpretations, only a few have made a direct, element-to-element comparison between the pavilion and its authentic counterparts from Indian Mughal or Rajput architecture. This study aims to close the gap by examining the ideological reinterpretation of Indian design work within a Western colonial framework, in addition to the formal parallels.
The main goal of this research is to find out how the Brighton Pavilion reimagines and repurposes Indian architectural elements while exposing the cultural and political beliefs ingrained in this architectural synthesis. By doing this, the article hopes to add to the conversation about colonial architectural hybridity by establishing the Pavilion as a significant piece of imperial representation and Orientalist design logic rather than merely a stylistic peculiarity.