Evi M. Bakker
Please Note
2 records found
1
OBJECTIVES: Patients with advanced cancer are increasingly encouraged to self-manage the medical, psychosocial, and practical consequences of their illness. However, the impact of self-management skills on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation remains unclear. Therefore, we examined self-management skills among patients with advanced cancer and their associations with depressive symptoms, quality of life, and formal and informal healthcare utilisation. DESIGN AND SETTING: We embedded a cross-sectional questionnaire study in a Dutch nationwide prospective observational cohort study (eQuiPe study). PARTICIPANTS: 464 patients with advanced cancer (response rate 42.1%). 50% of the participants were women, and the mean age was 66 years (SD = 10). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-management skills were assessed using three scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Skill and technique acquisition (STA), Self-monitoring and insight (SMI), and Health services navigation (HSN) (range: 1-4). Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations (adjusting for sociodemographic and medical characteristics) between self-management skills and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), and healthcare utilisation in the past month (healthcare organisations and disciplines; hospital admissions; emergency care visits; informal care). RESULTS: Mean (SD) scores were 3.0 (0.5) for STA, 3.2 (0.4) for SMI, and 3.4 (0.5) for HSN. Higher scores of self-management skills on all three scales were significantly associated with fewer depressive symptoms (STA: β = -2.36, 95% CI -2.98 to -1.69; SMI: β = -2.88, 95% CI -3.64 to -2.09; HSN: β = -2.06, 95% CI -2.76 to -1.37). Patients with higher levels of STA and SMI reported better quality of life (β = 8.54, 95% CI 5.84 to 11.01 and β = 8.41, 95% CI 4.75 to 11.99, respectively). Regarding healthcare utilisation, only HSN showed a significant association, with higher scores being associated with increased nurse contact (β = 1.65, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.56). CONCLUSIONS: Greater self-management skills were associated with fewer depressive symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. However, self-management skills were hardly associated with healthcare utilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register; NTR6584.
To obtain insight into adaptation processes of redefining normality and its influencing factors in relatives of patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
An exploratory qualitative study among relatives of patients with advanced cancer was conducted. Participants were purposively recruited. Ten in-depth individual (relative only) and 16 dyad (relative and patient together) interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of thematic analysis, drawing on elements of grounded theory, combining both inductive and deductive elements.
Results
Two adaptation processes of (redefining) normality were identified: assimilation and accommodation. The latter was found to be the main way of adapting to new events. Assimilative coping strategies entailed “continuing to do the same activities as done before the disease,” “difficulty accepting the situation,” “avoiding to think about the disease,” and “living in the short term.” Accommodative strategies involved “arranging practical matters,” “thinking about the future,” “doing what is feasible,” “engaging in new activities,” “accepting the situation,” “seeking distraction,” “living in the short term,” and “focusing on what truly matters in life.” The interplay between the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, a deteriorating disease status, and the accompanying uncertainty about the future was of influence on the relatives' coping strategies.
Conclusion
When the new situation is too divergent to assimilate, accommodation may be necessary for relatives to cope with the growing complexity of the consequences of their loved one's illness. Accommodative coping then involves accepting the changing reality and actively making the necessary adjustments to build resilience and cope with the new circumstances. ...
To obtain insight into adaptation processes of redefining normality and its influencing factors in relatives of patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
An exploratory qualitative study among relatives of patients with advanced cancer was conducted. Participants were purposively recruited. Ten in-depth individual (relative only) and 16 dyad (relative and patient together) interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of thematic analysis, drawing on elements of grounded theory, combining both inductive and deductive elements.
Results
Two adaptation processes of (redefining) normality were identified: assimilation and accommodation. The latter was found to be the main way of adapting to new events. Assimilative coping strategies entailed “continuing to do the same activities as done before the disease,” “difficulty accepting the situation,” “avoiding to think about the disease,” and “living in the short term.” Accommodative strategies involved “arranging practical matters,” “thinking about the future,” “doing what is feasible,” “engaging in new activities,” “accepting the situation,” “seeking distraction,” “living in the short term,” and “focusing on what truly matters in life.” The interplay between the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, a deteriorating disease status, and the accompanying uncertainty about the future was of influence on the relatives' coping strategies.
Conclusion
When the new situation is too divergent to assimilate, accommodation may be necessary for relatives to cope with the growing complexity of the consequences of their loved one's illness. Accommodative coping then involves accepting the changing reality and actively making the necessary adjustments to build resilience and cope with the new circumstances.