Various techniques have been studied to handle unexpected changes in data streams, a phenomenon called concept drift. When the incoming data is not labeled and the labels are also not obtainable with a reasonable effort, detecting these drifts becomes less trivial. This study evaluates how well two data distribution based label-independent drift detection methods, SyncStream and Statistical Change Detection for Multi-Dimensional Data, detect concept drift. This is done by implementing the algorithms and evaluating them side by side on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The metrics used for synthetic datasets are False Positive Rate and Latency; for real-world datasets, Accuracy is used instead of Latency. The experiments show that both drift detectors perform significantly worse on real-world than on synthetic data.