C. Peng
Please Note
4 records found
1
Background: In-feed antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been a cornerstone in the livestock industry due to their role in enhancing growth and feed efficiency. However, concerns over antibiotic resistance have driven a shift away from AGPs toward natural alternatives. Despite the widespread use, the exact mechanisms of AGPs and alternatives are not fully understood. This necessitates holistic studies that investigate microbiota dynamics, host responses, and the interactions between these elements in the context of AGPs and alternative feed additives. Methods: In this study, we conducted a multifaceted investigation of how Bacitracin, a common AGP, and a natural alternative impact both cecum microbiota and host expression in chickens. In addition to univariate and static differential abundance and expression analyses, we employed multivariate and time-course analyses to study this problem. To reveal host-microbe interactions, we assessed their overall correspondence and identified treatment-specific pairs of species and host expressed genes that showed significant correlations over time. Results: Our analysis revealed that factors such as developmental age substantially impacted the cecum ecosystem more than feed additives. While feed additives significantly altered microbial compositions in the later stages, they did not significantly affect overall host gene expression. The differential expression indicated that with AGP administration, host transmembrane transporters and metallopeptidase activities were upregulated around day 21. Together with the modulated kininogen binding and phenylpyruvate tautomerase activity over time, this likely contributes to the growth-promoting effects of AGPs. The difference in responses between AGP and PFA supplementation suggests that these additives operate through distinct mechanisms. Conclusion: We investigated the impact of a common AGP and its natural alternative on poultry cecum ecosystem through an integrated analysis of both the microbiota and host responses. We found that AGP appears to enhance host nutrient utilization and modulate immune responses. The insights we gained are critical for identifying and developing effective AGP alternatives to advance sustainable livestock farming practices.
Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes
Insights and considerations
Background: Assembly algorithm choice should be a deliberate, well-justified decision when researchers create genome assemblies for eukaryotic organisms from third-generation sequencing technologies. While third-generation sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) has overcome the disadvantages of short read lengths specific to next-generation sequencing (NGS), third-generation sequencers are known to produce more error-prone reads, thereby generating a new set of challenges for assembly algorithms and pipelines. However, the introduction of HiFi reads, which offer substantially reduced error rates, has provided a promising solution for more accurate assembly outcomes. Since the introduction of third-generation sequencing technologies, many tools have been developed that aim to take advantage of the longer reads, and researchers need to choose the correct assembler for their projects. Results: We benchmarked state-of-the-art long-read de novo assemblers to help readers make a balanced choice for the assembly of eukaryotes. To this end, we used 12 real and 64 simulated datasets from different eukaryotic genomes, with different read length distributions, imitating PacBio continuous long-read (CLR), PacBio high-fidelity (HiFi), and ONT sequencing to evaluate the assemblers. We include 5 commonly used long-read assemblers in our benchmark: Canu, Flye, Miniasm, Raven, and wtdbg2 for ONT and PacBio CLR reads. For PacBio HiFi reads, we include 5 state-of-the-art HiFi assemblers: HiCanu, Flye, Hifiasm, LJA, and MBG. Evaluation categories address the following metrics: reference-based metrics, assembly statistics, misassembly count, BUSCO completeness, runtime, and RAM usage. Additionally, we investigated the effect of increased read length on the quality of the assemblies and report that read length can, but does not always, positively impact assembly quality. Conclusions: Our benchmark concludes that there is no assembler that performs the best in all the evaluation categories. However, our results show that overall Flye is the best-performing assembler for PacBio CLR and ONT reads, both on real and simulated data. Meanwhile, best-performing PacBio HiFi assemblers are Hifiasm and LJA. Next, the benchmarking using longer reads shows that the increased read length improves assembly quality, but the extent to which that can be achieved depends on the size and complexity of the reference genome.