With the growing need for machine learning knowledge for many different expertises and positions, comes a growing need for machine learning education for non-computer scientists. Teaching machine learning concepts to non-majors comes with the added challenge of dealing with different levels of prior mathematical knowledge. Existing research is inconclusive on the correlation between this prior knowledge and topic-specific machine learning knowledge gain. This paper evaluated this via an experiment conducted on Computer Science and Physics students without prior machine learning education. We find that there is no clear correlation between general math knowledge and knowledge gain. There is however a clear correlation of proficiency in probability and statistics, and algorithm heavy machine learning topics. The experiment also concluded that most students struggled most with these math-heavy topics, as well as understanding abstract systems such as perceptrons.

Computer vision tasks have shown to benefit greatly from both developments in deep learning networks, and the emergence of event cameras. Deep networks can require a large amount of training data, which is not readily available for event cameras, specifically for optical flow estimation. The need for simulating this data in a realistic, physics-driven manner is therefore crucial. This paper compares the state of the art event camera simulators on different criteria, including event timestamp modeling, performance under low illumination, bandwidth simulation, computation speed and various types of noise simulation. We also summarize the shortcomings of some commonly used optical flow event datasets. For generating high-quality, realistic events, The V2E and DVS-Voltmeter simulators have shown to produce the most accurate data.