The increasing demand for sustainable development in engineering practice has triggered researchers to explore solutions to reduce the CO₂ footprint caused by Portland cement (PC) production. Alkali-activated concrete (AAC), made by alkali activation of industrial by-products, poses to be a sustainable alternative to traditional Portland cement concrete. Despite vast studies on its material properties, there is still insufficient knowledge on the structural performance of reinforced AAC members, which impedes its widespread application. Bond between concrete and embedded reinforcement is critical for the structural behaviour of reinforced members, including crack propagation (crack opening and crack spacing), load carrying capacity, deformational capacity and seismic resistance. In this chapter, a critical review on the bond behaviour between AAC and reinforcement is given. A vast variety of tests have been used for studying the AAC-reinforcement bond. Similar to traditional PC concrete, different setup configurations and specimen geometries affect not only the measured bond strength, but also the nature of the bond response. Therefore, in this review different bond tests are discussed, focusing on application of both conventional steel and fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) as reinforcement. Given that AAC is a wide class of materials with largely varying mechanical properties, this study systematically classifies bond results based on different types of precursors used. Furthermore, numerical methods to predict AAC flexural response as well as the applicability of existing PC concrete design codes are summarized. It is concluded that AAC beams show comparable short-term bond behaviour with traditional PC concrete of the same strength class. Although the design codes for traditional concrete turn out to be usually applicable for the AAC-reinforcement bond, opposite trends were also reported. Finally, whereas the short-term behaviour has been widely investigated for AAC bond, systematic studies dealing with its long-term behaviour are lacking. Time dependent effects must be considered when developing reliable guidelines and recommendations for future structural design of AAC.

A promising solution for reducing the carbon footprint of concrete is the use of alkali-activated concretes (AAC). Before this material can be widely applied, its long-term behaviour needs to be understood, especially since some studies reported a decrease of mechanical properties over time. Similarly, Prinsse et al. reported decreasing mechanical properties, especially elastic modulus and flexural and splitting tensile strength for the studied slag-based AAC (S100) and the blended slag- and fly-ash-based AAC (S50) up to the tested age of 2 years. They hypothesized that these decreases could be only temporarily. To test that hypothesis, this study continued to monitor the mechanical properties of both AACs up to the age of 5 years. As a reference, two OPC-based concretes (OPCC), with different strength classes, are monitored up to the age of 3.5 years. In addition, the internal structures of the concretes are assessed for carbonation and internal micro cracking. S100 shows stabilization of the elastic modulus and the compressive strength, whereas the tensile splitting strength continued to decrease up to 5 years. This is attributed to a combination of carbonation and drying, since the microscopic analysis showed increased porosity around the ITZ and in the carbonated region. In addition, S50 shows an ongoing decrease of all tested mechanical properties, which is attributed to carbonation. No decreases in mechanical properties are found for OPCC.

Although alkali activated concretes (AACs) are promising for reducing the carbon emissions of concrete, in order to enable their wide application it is vital to understand their long-term behaviour. Herein, we report the development of mechanical properties of a ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS)-based AAC and a binary fly ash (FA) /GGBFS-based AAC exposed to 55% relative humidity and 20 °C up to the age of 5 years. For comparison, two ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concretes were monitored for 3.5 years. For the GGBFS-based AAC, after an initial decrease within the first 6 months the elastic compressive modulus stabilized, while its tensile splitting strength continued to decrease for the tested period of 5 years. The binary AAC showed a continuous decrease in its tensile splitting strength for 5 years and a reduction in its compressive strength after 2 years. No decreases in mechanical properties were observed in OPC-based concretes. To reveal underlying mechanisms, additional analyses were performed. Permanent degradation was observed in both AACs; the binary AAC mainly suffered from carbonation, and the GGBFS-based AAC showed microcracking. These cracks were probably caused by drying shrinkage and drying-induced chemical changes. Based on the measured mechanical properties of AAC, crack widths and stiffness of reinforced AAC beams under bending were analytically evaluated and compared to experiments. Decreases in bending stiffness and increases in crack width were observed for reinforced AAC beams tested at later ages. A bimodular approach is proposed to predict the reduction of bending stiffness in the studied AACs over time. These findings are relevant to understand serviceability limit states of reinforced AACs.