XY
Xuedong Yan
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
3 records found
1
From ride-hailing to high-capacity ride-sharing
A user-centric shared mobility service design
Journal article
(2025)
-
Rongge Guo, Xiaobing Liu, Yite Sun, Xuedong Yan, Wei Guan, Shadi Sharif Azadeh
Ride-sharing services operated by transportation network companies (TNCs) have the potential to expand capacity and accommodate increasing urban mobility demands, presenting an alternative to traditional ride-hailing services. This study introduces a high-capacity ride-sharing (HCRS) system that leverages user-specific travel choices and incentive-based pricing schemes. This innovative system enhances the dynamic matching problem of HCRS by incorporating a nested choice model and dynamic fare adjustment strategies to boost profitability while encouraging shared travel behaviours. Additionally, a rolling horizon solution approach is employed, including a shared choice set generation algorithm for creating shared alternatives and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS)-based method for optimal matching. By leveraging a real dataset from Beijing's ride-hailing services, this research underscores that the HCRS service can significantly improve system efficiency and service quality, achieving more than 10.44% reduction in operating costs, and reducing average fares (¥3.31) and emissions (3.49 kg) across various users, compared to traditional ride-hailing services. The findings also demonstrate that users' decision-making is profoundly affected by changes in incentives, highlighting the importance of incentive settings in enhancing user engagement and system performance.
...
Ride-sharing services operated by transportation network companies (TNCs) have the potential to expand capacity and accommodate increasing urban mobility demands, presenting an alternative to traditional ride-hailing services. This study introduces a high-capacity ride-sharing (HCRS) system that leverages user-specific travel choices and incentive-based pricing schemes. This innovative system enhances the dynamic matching problem of HCRS by incorporating a nested choice model and dynamic fare adjustment strategies to boost profitability while encouraging shared travel behaviours. Additionally, a rolling horizon solution approach is employed, including a shared choice set generation algorithm for creating shared alternatives and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS)-based method for optimal matching. By leveraging a real dataset from Beijing's ride-hailing services, this research underscores that the HCRS service can significantly improve system efficiency and service quality, achieving more than 10.44% reduction in operating costs, and reducing average fares (¥3.31) and emissions (3.49 kg) across various users, compared to traditional ride-hailing services. The findings also demonstrate that users' decision-making is profoundly affected by changes in incentives, highlighting the importance of incentive settings in enhancing user engagement and system performance.
Journal article
(2023)
-
Xiaomeng Li, Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Amir Pooyan Afghari, Sherrie Anne Kaye, Xuedong Yan
Automated vehicles have started to be integrated into the road transportation system and operate in a mixed traffic environment. To ensure a smooth and successful integration, it is vital to have a good understanding of the human factor challenges involved in the process, especially the issues related to other road users who will share roads with automated vehicles. The study focuses on conventional vehicle drivers’ acceptance of and interaction with fully automated vehicles (FAV). An online survey with experimental scenarios showing an FAV's lane-changing intention was designed to test the interaction responses of participants. The survey also collected the participants’ demographic information (e.g., age, gender, driving experience), self-reported general driving behaviours (e.g., errors, lapses and violations), past benchmark behaviour in the same situation and their acceptance of FAVs. The study recruited 838 participants in total, comprising 465 participants from Australia (216 males vs. 249 females) and 373 participants from China (172 males vs. 201 females). Ordered probit models were developed to predict three types of behavioural responses of drivers in the lane-changing scenario, i.e., positive, disregardful and aggressive responses. The results showed that older drivers, females, and drivers who had less driving experience were more likely to adopt positive interactions with FAVs than their counterparts. Drivers who reported frequent risky driving behaviours (e.g., aggressions, lapses and errors) were less likely to report positive interaction but more likely to report disregardful and aggressive interactions. Drivers reporting more positive/favourable attitudes and a higher trust toward FAVs demonstrated a higher possibility of positive interaction, and those with higher perceived behaviour control were more likely to restrain disregardful interaction. The study helps to form a greater understanding of conventional vehicle drivers’ perception of FAVs and the underlying factors that may influence their interaction behavioural tendency.
...
Automated vehicles have started to be integrated into the road transportation system and operate in a mixed traffic environment. To ensure a smooth and successful integration, it is vital to have a good understanding of the human factor challenges involved in the process, especially the issues related to other road users who will share roads with automated vehicles. The study focuses on conventional vehicle drivers’ acceptance of and interaction with fully automated vehicles (FAV). An online survey with experimental scenarios showing an FAV's lane-changing intention was designed to test the interaction responses of participants. The survey also collected the participants’ demographic information (e.g., age, gender, driving experience), self-reported general driving behaviours (e.g., errors, lapses and violations), past benchmark behaviour in the same situation and their acceptance of FAVs. The study recruited 838 participants in total, comprising 465 participants from Australia (216 males vs. 249 females) and 373 participants from China (172 males vs. 201 females). Ordered probit models were developed to predict three types of behavioural responses of drivers in the lane-changing scenario, i.e., positive, disregardful and aggressive responses. The results showed that older drivers, females, and drivers who had less driving experience were more likely to adopt positive interactions with FAVs than their counterparts. Drivers who reported frequent risky driving behaviours (e.g., aggressions, lapses and errors) were less likely to report positive interaction but more likely to report disregardful and aggressive interactions. Drivers reporting more positive/favourable attitudes and a higher trust toward FAVs demonstrated a higher possibility of positive interaction, and those with higher perceived behaviour control were more likely to restrain disregardful interaction. The study helps to form a greater understanding of conventional vehicle drivers’ perception of FAVs and the underlying factors that may influence their interaction behavioural tendency.
Mobile phone distraction has been recognized as an adverse factor that degrades drivers’ performance on road. Although research showed that drivers take various compensatory strategies to minimize the risk in distracted driving, little consensus has been achieved regarding the actual change in collision risk because of compensatory behaviours. This study aims to investigate the impact of mobile phone use and drivers’ compensatory behaviours on the collision risk in a car-following situation. By using a high-fidelity driving simulator, 37 participants completed the simulation experiment in three mobile phone use conditions: no phone (baseline), hands-free and hand-held. Cluster analysis was adopted to classify the final collision risk into different levels. Two logit regression models were developed to examine the relationships between drivers’ characteristics, mobile phone use, collision avoidance performances and their involvement in the collision risk. Results show that compared to no phone and hands-free, drivers using hand-held phone had a longer brake reaction time and also an increased likelihood of being involved in a high risk group. Drivers compensated to reduce the likelihood of safety-critical events through a simultaneous control of car-following speed and distance (i.e. Time-to-collision (TTC)) in distracted condition. Additionally, the results also indicated that female drivers and non-professional drivers were more likely to be involved in high risk group than male drivers and professional drivers. The study provided a systematic method to quantify the impact of mobile phone distraction and drivers’ compensation behaviors on collision risk. The effectiveness of compensatory strategy by controlling TTC also shed light on the development of intelligent transport systems to help distracted drivers avoid safety-critical situations.
...
Mobile phone distraction has been recognized as an adverse factor that degrades drivers’ performance on road. Although research showed that drivers take various compensatory strategies to minimize the risk in distracted driving, little consensus has been achieved regarding the actual change in collision risk because of compensatory behaviours. This study aims to investigate the impact of mobile phone use and drivers’ compensatory behaviours on the collision risk in a car-following situation. By using a high-fidelity driving simulator, 37 participants completed the simulation experiment in three mobile phone use conditions: no phone (baseline), hands-free and hand-held. Cluster analysis was adopted to classify the final collision risk into different levels. Two logit regression models were developed to examine the relationships between drivers’ characteristics, mobile phone use, collision avoidance performances and their involvement in the collision risk. Results show that compared to no phone and hands-free, drivers using hand-held phone had a longer brake reaction time and also an increased likelihood of being involved in a high risk group. Drivers compensated to reduce the likelihood of safety-critical events through a simultaneous control of car-following speed and distance (i.e. Time-to-collision (TTC)) in distracted condition. Additionally, the results also indicated that female drivers and non-professional drivers were more likely to be involved in high risk group than male drivers and professional drivers. The study provided a systematic method to quantify the impact of mobile phone distraction and drivers’ compensation behaviors on collision risk. The effectiveness of compensatory strategy by controlling TTC also shed light on the development of intelligent transport systems to help distracted drivers avoid safety-critical situations.