In recent decades, public architecture has increasingly been called upon to play a role in social, economic, and environmental change. In regions impacted by industrial extraction, exploitation, and political neglect, public buildings must exist not as mere civic objects, but rather as spaces where belonging, access, and collective identity are fostered. Such areas often tend to contribute disproportionately to national prosperity, yet remain marginal and peripheral when it comes to public investment, representation, and spatial quality. Several by-products of such processes include the physical deterioration of the built environment, social fragmentation, demographic decline, and a weakened sense of belonging within communities.

The northern region of Groningen is one such case, which has, for decades, been affected by processes of extraction. While gas extraction in the area has generated national economic benefit, it has left local communities with enduring social, spatial and psychological consequences, such as seismic damage, a loss of trust in the government, and a weakened sense of identity.

In response to these issues, the Dutch government has recently proposed Nij Begun, a long-term, 30-year agenda with the aim of rebuilding the future of Groningen and North Drenthe. This proposal serves as a point of departure for the project. Nij Begun addresses regions that, for decades, have been impacted by gas extraction and as a consequence, also by multiple earthquakes. In turn, this has caused serious damage to buildings, as well as economical and psychological issues to inhabitants.

This project departs from the Nij Begun agenda and its key principles such as addressing mental health and wellbeing, improving health and liveability, increasing participation, and fostering community spirit and pride. It aims to provide an environment of wellbeing. Through strengthening the relationship of the site with water, and creating public spaces and buildings which foster connection to others, and to nature, the project aims to generate a sense of identity, belonging, and community for the locals, while also attracting visitors to the region. ... Read more

Embedding an architectural project in its context exceeds the mere use of materials and spatial devices. Rather, those are simply the tools used to convey a message, and to reflect certain values. Any piece of architecture with an urban, residential location, has the potential to impact the daily lives of citizens. This is especially the case when it comes to a typology concerned with highly personal and sensitive matters, such as the architecture of commemoration. Since the early twentieth century, an increased level of importance has been placed on the experiential qualities offered by commemorative architecture. There has been a willingness to move away from standalone objects, which symbolise or represent past events or memories, and do not, in principle, possess spatial characteristics.

The term memorial has gradually come to replace the term monument. As with monuments, memorials can still be single objects of various sizes, placed in specific configurations. In essence, the terminology shift refers to the need for individuals to be liberated from the role of the mere observer, to the active participant. Consequently, the concept of integrating a memorial into public space, and the urban fabric of a city, has been on the rise.

This paper aims to explore the role of the National Memorial of Names in the remembrance of Amsterdam’s traumatic past, questioning whether it aids the mourning of the city. It aims to unravel the meaning and importance of community participation in memorial architecture, arguing that, the value of such structures often emerges through the making process itself, and through the way in which it infuses into the city fabric, into neighbourhoods and communities. The paper will address the significance of scale, revealing the way in which it can become a major factor in the rise of controversy surrounding a proposal. The interrelated concepts of public involvement, proportion, and boundaries, will be dealt with. More than with any other typology, commemorative spaces deal with the tension between every-day life and occasion, between the mundane and the spiritual. The text will explore what it means to create site-specific architecture, in terms not only of material and spatial realms, but those related to the people of its context.
... Read more