NA
N. Annadanam
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
1 records found
1
In this work, we extend nanoTabPFN, a Prior-Data Fitted Network (PFN) for tabular classification to produce Shapley attributions alongside its predictive distribution. The output is a bucketed distribution over signed feature attribution values. The class prediction is derived as the additive sum of a baseline and per-feature contributions, ensuring the explanation is faithful to the prediction by construction. The attribution head is supervised by TreeSHAP values from a decision tree prior, connecting the explanation to the data generating process (DGP). The resulting attributions are interpreted as a posterior over Shapley values. The PFN’s distributional mechanism is transferred to feature attributions to yield calibrated explanation uncertainty. Across synthetic and real tabular benchmarks, the model recovers attributions with high fidelity (R2 ≈ 0.94-0.95 against exact Shapley on synthetic data), but at a small cost to accuracy. It produces calibrated attribution uncertainty, with negative log-likelihood (NLL) below the uninformative uniform baseline.
...
In this work, we extend nanoTabPFN, a Prior-Data Fitted Network (PFN) for tabular classification to produce Shapley attributions alongside its predictive distribution. The output is a bucketed distribution over signed feature attribution values. The class prediction is derived as the additive sum of a baseline and per-feature contributions, ensuring the explanation is faithful to the prediction by construction. The attribution head is supervised by TreeSHAP values from a decision tree prior, connecting the explanation to the data generating process (DGP). The resulting attributions are interpreted as a posterior over Shapley values. The PFN’s distributional mechanism is transferred to feature attributions to yield calibrated explanation uncertainty. Across synthetic and real tabular benchmarks, the model recovers attributions with high fidelity (R2 ≈ 0.94-0.95 against exact Shapley on synthetic data), but at a small cost to accuracy. It produces calibrated attribution uncertainty, with negative log-likelihood (NLL) below the uninformative uniform baseline.