A pilot for a large scale, fully integrated chain of CO2 capture, transport and storage (CCS) has been initiated in the port of Rotterdam. The initiative aims to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of CCS and show that it can be deployed on a large scale for power plants and energy-intensive industries that emit large volumes of CO2. The partially-depleted Q16-Maas gas condensate field could potentially be used to permanently store the captured greenhouse gas (CO2). The case study shows the potential that this field has for CO2 storage and also examines other options for life-cycle extension. The case study is based on macroscopic scale reservoir behaviour and simulated in the fully compositional simulator, Eclipse 300. Gas reservoirs have a proven track record for safely trapping gaseous phases in the subsurface over long geological timescales. As long as initial reservoir conditions, mainly pressure (=296,5 bar), are not exceeded, CO2 in supercritical phase should be safely stored. According to literature, with increasing storage time, the CO2 is even trapped more securely, although this process may take hundreds to thousands of years. The results of the case study show that approximately 1.1 million tonnes of pure CO2 can be stored in Q16-Maas field. By side-tracking the original well and producing the attic gas in the reservoir, 160 million cubic meters of additional gas can be recovered, along with condensate. If the side-tracked well is then converted to a CO2-injection well, the CO2 storage capacity is increased to 1.4 million tonnes. This injectable CO2 volume is less than the two million tonnes originally estimated and this is due to the influx of water from a strong aquifer that has partially filled the void left by depleting the gas field. The possibility of enhanced gas and condensate recovery using CO2 has also been investigated in this case study, as the use of CO2 for miscible floods in hydrocarbon reservoirs has been proven and used successfully as a tertiary recovery method. The reservoir simulation of the Q16-Maas field shows that there is no additional hydrocarbon recovery by CO2 flooding. Sidetracking to and producing from an updip location in the reservoir is equally as productive. The reason for this is attributed to presence of a strong water aquifer, together with the varying reservoir quality and thickness prevents the successful application of CO2 enhanced hydrocarbon recovery. The total cost of transport and storage (OPEX and CAPEX) was estimated to be 71.5 million euro. Assuming CO2 storage volume of 1.4 million tonnes, the project would need to receive roughly 50 euro/tonne in order to breakeven for storing and transporting the CO2, the capturing is not included.