Imaging spectroscopy methods are becoming increasingly relevant in the field of cultural heritage science. The datacubes output by these methods represent some of the most significant challenges related to their application, namely howto make sense of complex multi-dimensional da
...
Imaging spectroscopy methods are becoming increasingly relevant in the field of cultural heritage science. The datacubes output by these methods represent some of the most significant challenges related to their application, namely howto make sense of complex multi-dimensional datasets. As the selection of imaging spectroscopy methods and the complexity of the resulting datasets continue to grow, the time required to conduct all these measurements and process all of the data also increases. This research focuses on addressing both the problem of extended data acquisition times and the challenge of processing the complex datacubes.
Firstly, chapter 1 introduces the basic concepts of cultural heritage and the field of cultural heritage science. It also provides an overview of some of the scientific methods used for the study of cultural heritage objects, with a focus on imaging methods, and particularly imaging spectroscopy methods. The two primary methods considered in this work, macro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (MA-XRF) and reflectance imaging spectroscopy (RIS), are described in greater detail and an overview of the state-of-the-art in equipment and data processing methods is provided.
Beginning with the issue of data processing, chapter 2 discusses a novel method for the use of short-wave infrared (SWIR) (1000–2500nm) RIS for semi-quantitative analysis of historical paintings. The method consists of the isolation and deconvolution of characteristic absorption features of target pigments. The concept is proven on two pigments, lead white and blue verditer. The method is tested on a set of specially prepared paint samples as well as a 16th century painting. The method is compared to MA-XRF on its ability to selectively map pigments as well as its ability to provide quantitative information on the pigment concentrations. A novel data visualization method, able to visualize chemical relevance of individual pixels whilst also highlighting larger spatial patterns, is also presented.
Chapter 3 continues on the topic of data processing, presenting a novel approach for the analysis of damaged historical manuscripts through the use of visible and nearinfrared (VNIR) (400–1000 nm) RIS combined with supervised machine learning methods and machine learning explainability methods. The approach uses manually labeled VNIR RIS data acquired from historical manuscripts to train an XGBoost classification model, followed by the application of Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to analyse the behaviour of the classification model. The calculated SHAP values are then used to calculate a SHAP-weighted intensity map (SWIM), which is found to improve the legibility of the analysed manuscripts. An adaptive colour scheme is also proposed as a method of easing the evaluation by paleographists of the resulting images. The approach is tested on two texts, the Leiden Riddle, a 9-10th century Northumbrian text, and the 1669 First Set of the Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina, the earliest text attributed to political philosopher John Locke.
Shifting to the issue of data acquisition, chapter 4 documents the design and testing of two MA-XRF scanners. These scanners, the big lead box (BLB) Mark I and Mark II, are designed to be flexiblemeasurement platforms that allow for the testing of alternate scanning strategies and multi-modal acquisitions. Highlighted are the safety features implemented into the design of the scanners with the goal of minimizing potential radiation exposure to users and bystanders.
Following the development of the MA-XRF scanners, chapter 5 discusses two methods for the acceleration of MA-XRF measurements through the use of smart scanning strategies. The first method, the Fast Autonomous Scanning Toolkit (FAST), uses machine learning models to dynamically select which pixels to scan whilst trying to reduce the estimated distortion between the reconstructed data set and the underlying ground truth. The second method, the Chopp algorithm, uses a double scan approach, where a first fast initial scan is used to estimate the optimal scan time per pixel for a second scan with a specified total scan time. The two methods are evaluated on their scan times and the achieved data quality compared to each other and a traditional raster scan.
Lastly, chapter 6 provides some concluding remarks on the themes covered during this work and highlights potential future developments.