The combination of interstitial hyperthermia treatment (IHT) with high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) can improve clinical outcomes since it highly enhances the efficiency of cell kill, especially when applied simultaneously. Therefore, we have developed the ThermoBrachy applicators. To effectively apply optimal targeted IHT, treatment planning is considered essential. However, treatment planning in IHT is rarely applied as it is regarded as difficult to accurately calculate the deposited energy in the tissue in a short enough time for clinical practice. In this study, we investigated various time‐efficient methods for fast computation of the electromagnetic (EM) energy deposition resulting from the ThermoBrachy applicators. Initially, we investigated the use of an electro‐quasistatic solver. Next, we extended our investigation to the application of geometric simplifications. Furthermore, we investigated the validity of the superpositioning principle, which can enable adaptive treatment plan optimization without the need for continuous recomputation of the EM field. Finally, we evaluated the accuracy of the methods by comparing them to the golden standard Finite‐Difference Time‐Domain calculation method using gamma‐index analysis. The simplifications considerably reduced the computation time needed, improving from >12 h to a few seconds. All investigated methods showed excellent agreement with the golden standard by showing a >99% passing rate with 1%/0.5 mm Dose Difference and Distance‐to‐Agreement criteria. These results allow the proposed electromagnetic simulation method to be used for fast and accurate adaptive treatment planning.@en

In high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer treatment, interstitial hyperthermia (IHT) is applied to sensitize the tumor to the radiation (RT) dose, aiming at a more efficient treatment. Simultaneous application of HDR-BT and IHT is anticipated to provide maximum radiosensitization of the tumor. With this rationale, the ThermoBrachyTherapy applicators have been designed and developed, enabling simultaneous irradiation and heating. In this research, we present a method to optimize the three-dimensional temperature distribution for simultaneous HDR-BT and IHT based on the resulting equivalent physical dose (EQDphys) of the combined treatment. First, the temperature resulting from each electrode is precomputed. Then, for a given set of electrode settings and a precomputed radiation dose, the EQDphys is calculated based on the temperature-dependent linear-quadratic model. Finally, the optimum set of electrode settings is found through an optimization algorithm. The method is applied on implant geometries and anatomical data of 10 previously irradiated patients, using reported thermoradiobiological parameters and physical doses. We found that an equal equivalent dose coverage of the target can be achieved with a physical RT dose reduction of 20% together with a significantly lower EQDphys to the organs at risk (p-value < 0.001), even in the least favorable scenarios. As a result, simultaneous ThermoBrachy-Therapy could lead to a relevant therapeutic benefit for patients with prostate cancer.@en

Prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive pubic arch interference (PAI) are generally considered non-eligible for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). Steerable needles have been developed to make these patients eligible again. This study aims to validate the dosimetric impact and performance of steerable needles within the conventional clinical setting. HDR BT treatment plans were generated, needle implantations were performed in a prostate phantom, with prostate volume > 55 cm3 and excessive PAI of 10 mm, and pre- and post-implant dosimetry were compared considering the dosimetric constraints: prostate V100 > 95 % (13.50 Gy), urethra D0.1cm3 < 115 % (15.53 Gy) and rectum D1cm3 < 75 % (10.13 Gy). The inclusion of steerable needles resulted in a notable enhancement of the dose distribution and prostate V100 compared to treatment plans exclusively employing rigid needles to address PAI. Furthermore, the steerable needle plan demonstrated better agreement between pre- and post-implant dosimetry (prostate V100: 96.24 % vs. 93.74 %) compared to the rigid needle plans (79.13 % vs. 72.86 % and 87.70 % vs. 81.76 %), with no major changes in the clinical workflow and no changes in the clinical set-up. The steerable needle approach allows for more flexibility in needle positioning, ensuring a highly conformal dose distribution, and hence, HDR BT is a feasible treatment option again for prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive PAI.@en

Prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive pubic arch interference (PAI) are generally considered non-eligible for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). Steerable needles have been developed to make these patients eligible again. This study aims to validate the dosimetric impact and performance of steerable needles within the conventional clinical setting. HDR BT treatment plans were generated, needle implantations were performed in a prostate phantom, with prostate volume > 55 cm3 and excessive PAI of 10 mm, and pre- and post-implant dosimetry were compared considering the dosimetric constraints: prostate V100 > 95 % (13.50 Gy), urethra D0.1cm3 < 115 % (15.53 Gy) and rectum D1cm3 < 75 % (10.13 Gy). The inclusion of steerable needles resulted in a notable enhancement of the dose distribution and prostate V100 compared to treatment plans exclusively employing rigid needles to address PAI. Furthermore, the steerable needle plan demonstrated better agreement between pre- and post-implant dosimetry (prostate V100: 96.24 % vs. 93.74 %) compared to the rigid needle plans (79.13 % vs. 72.86 % and 87.70 % vs. 81.76 %), with no major changes in the clinical workflow and no changes in the clinical set-up. The steerable needle approach allows for more flexibility in needle positioning, ensuring a highly conformal dose distribution, and hence, HDR BT is a feasible treatment option again for prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive PAI.@en