Large Language Models (LLMs) often rely on one general safety standard, but this is limited because toxicity is subjective: what one user finds offensive, another user may not. At the same time, creating personalized safety by fine-tuning a model for every user is expensive and impractical. To address this, my research studies pre-decoding interventions, which means modifying the user’s input prompt before the model generates a response. This offers a flexible and low-cost way to personalize alignment without changing the model’s weights. I evaluate two training-free approaches on the PRISM dataset using Qwen and Llama target models: an Untuned LLMs with Restyled In-context ALignment (URIAL)-inspired method, which adds personalized safety examples to the prompt, and a Personalized Black-Box Prompt Optimization Lite (PBPO-Lite) method, which uses a secondary model to rewrite the prompt based on a user’s toxicity profile. These methods are useful because they can adapt to a user’s needs at inference time without permanent model changes. The results show that both interventions bring the outputs closer to the highest rated PRISM answers, with URIAL achieving the strongest toxicity alignment: approximately 51% on Llama and 31% on Qwen. While the methods improve fluency compared with the base models, they can reduce performance on structured knowledge tasks. Overall, the findings suggest that personalized predecoding is a promising low-cost approach for toxicity alignment, provided that safety gains are balanced against possible losses in knowledge-task performance. ... Read more