Background: Despite several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adjuvant treatment with corticosteroids in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the effect of this intervention on mortality remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) of adjuvant treatment with corticosteroids on 30-day mortality in patients with CAP. Methods: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we included RCTs published before July 1, 2024, comparing adjuvant treatment with corticosteroids versus placebo in patients hospitalised with CAP. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality, collected across all trials, and analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. We analysed HTE using risk and effect modelling. For risk modelling, patients were classified as having less severe or severe CAP based on the pneumonia severity index (PSI), comparing PSI class I–III versus class IV–V. For effect modelling, we trained a corticosteroid-effect model on six trials and externally validated it using data from two trials, received after model preregistration. This model classified patients into two groups: no predicted benefit and predicted benefit from adjuvant treatment with corticosteroids. The literature search was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022380746. Findings: We included eight RCTs with 3224 patients. Across all eight trials, 246 (7·6%) patients died within 30 days (106 [6·6%] of 1618 in the corticosteroid group vs 140 [8·7%] of 1606 in the placebo group; odds ratio [OR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·56–0·94], p=0·017). The corticosteroid-effect model, which selected C-reactive protein (CRP), showed significant HTE during external validation in the two most recent trials. In these trials, 154 (11·4%) of 1355 patients died within 30 days (88 [13·1%] of 671 in the placebo group vs 66 [9·6%] of 684 in the corticosteroid group; OR 0·71 [95% CI 0·50–0·99], p=0·044). Among patients predicted to have no benefit (CRP ≤204 mg/L, n=725), no significant effect was observed (OR 0·98 [95% CI 0·63–1·50]), whereas for those with predicted benefit (CRP >204 mg/L, n=630), 39 (13·0%) of 301 patients died in the placebo group compared with 20 (6·1%) of 329 in the corticosteroid group (0·43 [0·25–0·76], p_interaction=0·026). No significant HTE was found between less severe CAP (PSI class I–III, n=229) and severe CAP (PSI class IV–V, n=1126). Corticosteroid therapy significantly increased hyperglycaemia risk (44 [12·8%] of 344 in the placebo group vs 84 [24·8%] of 339 in the corticosteroid group; OR 2·50 [95% CI 1·63–3·83], p<0·0001) and hospital re-admission risk (30 [3·7%] of 814 in the placebo group vs 57 [7·0%] of 819 in the corticosteroid group; 1·95 [1·24–3·07], p=0·0038). Interpretation: Overall, adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids significantly reduces 30-day mortality in patients hospitalised with CAP. The treatment effect varied significantly among subgroups based on CRP concentrations, with a substantial mortality reduction observed only in patients with high baseline CRP. Funding: None.

Background: Establishing a pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopy is common surgical practice, with the goal to create an optimal surgical workspace within the abdominal cavity while minimizing insufflation pressure. Individualized strategies, based on neuromuscular blockade (NMB), pre-stretching routines, and personalized intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) to enhance surgical conditions are strategies to improve surgical workspace. However, the specific impact of each factor remains uncertain. This study explores the effects and side-effects of modifying intra-abdominal volume (IAV) through moderate and complete NMB in a porcine laparoscopy model. Methods: Thirty female Landrace pigs were randomly assigned to groups with complete NMB, regular NMB and a control group. Varying IAP levels were applied, and IAV was measured using CT scans. The study evaluated the maximum attainable IAV (V_max), the pressure at which the cavity opens (p₀), and the ease of expansion (λ_exp). Cardiorespiratory parameters, including peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), were continuously recorded to evaluate side-effects. Results: There were no significant weight differences between NMB groups (median 21.1 kg). Observed volumes ranged from 0 to 4.7 L, with a mean V_max of 3.82 L, mean p₀ of 1.23 mmHg, and mean λ_exp of 0.13 hPa⁻¹. NMB depth did not significantly affect these parameters. HR was significantly increased in the complete NMB group, while PIP, MAP, and CO remained unaffected. Repeated insufflation positively impacted V_max; ease of opening; and expanding the cavity. Conclusion: In this porcine model, the depth of NMB does not alter abdominal mechanics or increase the surgical workspace. Cardiorespiratory changes are more related to insufflation pressure and frequency rather than NMB depth. Future studies should compensate for the positive effect of repeated insufflation on abdominal mechanics and surgical conditions.