Since the industrial revolution the ocean has become noisier. The global increase in shipping is one of the main contributors to this. In some regions, shipping contributed to an increase in ambient noise of several decibels, especially at low frequencies (10 to 100 Hz). Such an increase can have a substantial negative impact on fish, invertebrates, marine mammals and birds interfering with key life functions (e.g. foraging, mating, resting, etc.). Consequently, engineers are investigating ways to reduce the noise emitted by vessels when designing new ships. At the same time, since the industrial revolution (starting around 1760) greenhouse gas emissions have increased the atmospheric carbon dioxide fraction x(CO₂) by more than 100 μmol mol^-1. The ocean uptake of approximately one third of the emitted CO₂ decreased the average global surface ocean pH from 8.21 to 8.10. This decrease is modifying sound propagation, especially sound absorption at the frequencies affected by shipping noise lower than 10 kHz, making the future ocean potentially noisier. There are also other climate change effects that may influence sound propagation. Sea surface warming might alter the depth of the deep sound speed channel, ice melting could locally decrease salinity and more frequent storms and higher wind speed alter the depth of the thermocline. In particular, modification of the sound speed profile can lead to the appearance of new ducts making specific depths noisier. In addition, ice melting and the increase in seawater temperature will open new shipping routes at the poles increasing anthropogenic noise in these regions. This review aims to discuss parameters that might change in the coming decades, focusing on the contribution of shipping, climate change and economic and technical developments to the future underwater soundscape in the ocean. Examples are given, contrasting the open ocean and the shallow seas. Apart from the changes in sound propagation, this review will also discuss the effects of water quality on ship-radiated noise with a focus on propeller cavitation noise.

The production of underwater sound is more and more considered to be an environmental risk. This has already been the case for military sonar for more than a decade, as sonar was identified as a possible cause of marine mammal strandings. The approach we adapted for military sonar is the following. The risk is characterized by computing the exposure (sound produced by the sonar) in an area around the source and by coupling that information to the effects it causes on a certain animal species. The risk is then quantified by taking into account the probability of the presence of that species in the area. If too large, the risk can be mitigated. We observe a trend of shifting the focus from individual disturbance to more general population consequences. A similar approach is advised to characterize the risks involved in the use of airguns in seismic acquisition.