The properties of reinforcing steel must comply with the fundamental assumptions underlying structural codes of practice on which verifications of structural behaviour are based. This is of predominant importance not only for design but also for assessment, where demand of deformation capacity of Reinforced Concrete (RC) is often considered implicitly. Yet, the actual deformation capacity directly depends on the mechanical properties and condition of reinforcing steel. Experimental results indicate that corrosion significantly reduces ductility, yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of reinforcement. It is however unclear which extent of corrosion may actually lead to a decrease of ultimate strain of the reinforcing steel below the minimum requirements following from the deformation capacity demands and how to consider such situations in the assessment of structures. The majority of information about the effects of corrosion on the mechanical properties of reinforcing steel is obtained from modern, ductile steel that has been corroded under an accelerated process, rather than under a more realistic long-term exposure. Moreover, experimental studies are fragmentary in scope and therefore often do not consistently consider important aspects such as the type of reinforcement steel and the morphology of the corrosion defect. Consequently, regression models developed to capture the effect of corrosion on reduction of the material properties of reinforcing steel, which are based on the empirical results, are usually characterised by large uncertainties. Given the lack of systematic consideration of the factors governing the reduction of the mechanical properties, such models tend to oversimplify the phenomena and are only to a limited extent suitable for the assessment of the structural safety of corroded structures. In this paper, governing factors for the reduction of mechanical properties of reinforcing steel due to pitting corrosion are investigated by an analytical model, accounting for the morphology of the corrosion defect and essential steel properties. Validation of the model shows good agreement with detailed FEA and experimental data.

Discussions have been underway in fib (Fédération Internationale du Béton) about advancing the fib Model Code for concrete structures. These include the fib international workshop in The Hague (June 2015), the fib MC2020 Core Group meeting in Madrid (December 2015), and a series of follow-up worldwide consultations on the fib ambition regarding the new developments in structural codes, including the special session on Model Code in the fib Symposium in Maastricht (June 2017). This paper discusses the main aspects of the development of fib MC2020, which is envisaged as a single-merged general code fully integrating the provisions for the design of new concrete structures with matters relating to existing concrete structure. It needs to deal effectively with both the design of structures and all the activities associated with the through-life management of existing concrete structures, including matters such as their in-service assessment and interventions upon them. To that end, MC2020 will take sustainability as a fundamental requirement, based upon a holistic treatment of societal needs and impacts, life-cycle cost and environmental impacts. This paper discusses the main aspects of the development of fib MC2020. As part of this, the envisaged contribution of fib T10.1: Model Code 2020 is reviewed. However, recognizing the overall ambition of the fib MC2020 project, it is clear that all fib commissions, along with other bodies able to make contributions on relevant topics, will need to work together to assemble the breadth of knowledge and expertise which will be required for the fib MC2020 project.