Worldwide, dam reservoirs loose over one percent of their storage capacity every year due to sedimentation. Proper management is therefore urgent. While drawdown flushing is considered an effective method to remove sediments from the reservoir, the increased sediment flux has an impact on the downstream environment. On the short term, several species suffer high mortality rates due to increased turbidity. Also on the long term the impacts might be significant. The deposition of fine sediments can change the habitat suitability and thereby jeopardize the conditions for recovery.

The aim of this research is to evaluate the effect of different flushing operation scenarios on the physical habitats at the ecologically relevant meso-scale. An idealised, depth-averaged hydro-morphodynamic model is set up in Delft3D-Flow, a modelling software package developed by Deltares. The model represents a reach of the Avisio, a river situated in the Eastern Italian Alps. Across this river, the Pezzè dam was built in 1952, trapping all incoming sediments. Every three years the dam is flushed, which gained more public attention over the last years. A specific reach was chosen as a reference case as it consists of a channel bar topography where fine sediments accumulate up to ten times more during a flushing event than in other, more channelised reaches. It is therefore considered the most affected by the flushing event. The reach has a length of roughly a kilometre and is situated 10 kilometres downstream of the dam.

The hydro-morphodynamic model assumes a non-erodible bed, as the coarsened river bed is not expected to move significantly during a flushing event. This bed has the shape of an alternate bar topography. The simulation of the flushing event is simplified as an influx of bed load transport with a fraction size of one millimetre, and a magnitude close to the equilibrium transport capacity. Deposition occurs upstream and to a higher extent downstream of the bars, where flow velocities are low and secondary flow aids the movement of sediments into these areas. Subsequently, a clean water peak is imposed to investigate its effectiveness in removing the fine sediments from the reach. The hydrograph of this peak is varied in shape, duration and magnitude to simulate different operation scenarios and natural rainfall runoff events.

By applying the Mesohabitat Evaluation Model (MEM), a habitat suitability model developed for the meso-scale, it was possible to divide the reach into classes based on flow velocity, flow depth and shear stress. Such classification highly depends on the governing discharge. The classes are mainly distinctive by the division between high and low energy classes and in this way show a high correlation to the deposition of fines. The model suggests that fine sediments remain in the system only when low energy classes are present. Although the MEM classification aims at the meso-scale, it follows a micro-scale approach and therefore undermines the advantages of assessment at the ecologically more relevant meso-scale. It is recommended to develop the MEM-procedure by accounting for neighbouring computational cells.

The MEM-procedure gives an useful indication of the spatial variety in deposition and erosion patterns. It however does not provide insight into the implications of sedimentation to the ecology, without the coupling with a biological model. Such a biological model describes the suitability of the physical habitat for a specific organism and thereby incorporates a functional goal.

As such a biological model could, due to time restrictions, not be applied in this research it was chosen to perform a micro-scale based suitability study. This illustrates the potential of morphodynamic modelling as a tool for habitat suitability modelling. Simplified preference curves were derived for spawning trout, of which the physical habitat requirements are sensitive to the deposition of fine sediments. It was found that the deposition of fine sediments hardly effects this habitat. When required nonetheless, any considered peak flow recovers a substantial amount of suitable habitat. This implies that, if a clean water peak of a sufficient magnitude follows the flushing operation, the impact on the spawning habitat, and probably any habitat, is minimal.

Whether such a clean water peak occurs, can be partly controlled by the dam operation, but also depends on the hydrology of the catchment. A ten-year hydrological time series of the Avisio river, measured upstream of the dam, shows that the catchment of this reservoir does not provide sufficient water to guarantee a clean water peak during any season. However, with the significant contribution of two tributaries that flow into the Avisio river between the dam and the reference reach, it is highly probable that a peak flow of sufficient magnitude occurs during high flow season. To ensure the benefits of a clean water peak, it is recommended to plan the flushing event at the start of the high water season, which lasts from May to July. For other rivers, it might be possible to adopt such a clean water peak as part of the flushing operation strategy, providing a higher level of control. Even though this study suggests that the implications of the flushing event to the physical habitats are minimal, and of no comparison to the potential direct impacts, this method of evaluation shows potential to assess other morphological relevant events and even long term morphological changes.