Engineered rivers are often prone to channel bed incision. This decreases the channel-floodplain connection, hampers navigation where nonerodible reaches increasingly protrude from the bed, and can destabilize structures. Here we inventorize causes and characteristics of channel incision measures. We elaborate on how channel bed incision is a transient channel response toward a new equilibrium channel state. Causes of incision comprise base level fall, channel narrowing (e.g., due to river training), channel shortening (bend cut-offs), an increased channel-forming discharge (e.g. due to climate change), and a decrease (or fining or coarsening) of the sediment flux from the upstream part of the basin. Finally, we discuss two measures that may mitigate channel bed incision: sediment nourishments and longitudinal training walls.

Engineering modifications of rivers, e.g., dams or groynes, often induce long-term riverbed erosion, which can be mitigated with sediment nourishments. Here, we consider nourishments to mitigate channel bed erosion induced by channel narrowing, as opposed to the more common application downstream of dams. Our objective is to assess and quantify how dumping location, grainsize, and volume are important for mitigation efficacy. Our results show that erosion can be mitigated if nourishments change the sediment flux such that the corresponding equilibrium channel slope is increased. This is achieved by coarsening the sediment flux throughout the reach, increasing magnitude of the sediment flux, or both. Flux is coarsened via additions of sediment at or coarser than the bed surface and nourished sediment should be distributed throughout the incising reach. The second option is nourishing a large volume of relatively fine sediment to increase the equilibrium channel slope. Additions of fine sediment in small volumes decrease the equilibrium channel slope and enhance erosion, because the fine sediment flux makes the gravel more mobile.

While most of the world's large rivers are heavily engineered, channel response to engineering measures on decadal to century and several 100 km scales is scarcely documented. We investigate the response of the Lower Rhine River (Germany-Netherlands) to engineering measures, in terms of channel slope and bed surface grain size. Field data show domain-wide incision, primarily associated with extensive channel narrowing. Remarkably, the channel slope has increased in the upstream end, which is uncommon under degradational conditions. We attribute the observed response to two competing mechanisms: bedrock at the upstream boundary increases the channel slope over the upstream part of the alluvial reach to compensate for the reduction of net annual sediment mobility, and extensive channel narrowing reduces the equilibrium slope. Another striking feature is the advance and flattening of the gravel-sand transition, suggesting its gradual fading due to an increasingly reduced slope difference between the gravel and sand reaches.

In response to changes in the upstream controls (i.e., the water discharge, the sediment supply rate, and the calibre of the load), engineered alluvial channels adjust their bed slope and bed surface texture to establish a new equilibrium state. Here we present and discuss various causes of degradational response of engineered channels to changes in the upstream controls and channel width. For that purpose, we apply a simplified 1D numerical research code to a schematic river reach of constant width consisting of mixed-size sediment, and assess its equilibrium state and transient response. We illustrate that the following perturbation to an initially equilibrium state lead to a degradational response: an increase of the water discharge, a decrease of the sediment supply rate, an increase of the sand content of the sediment supply, an increase of the gravel content of the sediment supply, and a decrease of the channel width. Degradational response under all conditions is associated with surface coarsening. The equilibrium states of the numerical simulations agree with analytical solutions. The results provide insight into the current degradational response of engineered rivers, such as the Rhine River, the Elbe River and the Danube River.

Laboratory experiments were conducted on a sand-gravel Gilbert delta to gain insight on its dynamics under varying base level. Base level rise results in intensified aggradation over the topset, as well as a decrease in topset slope and topset surface coarsening, the signals of which migrate in an upstream direction. Preferential deposition of coarse sediment in the topset results in a finer load at the topset-foreset break, which creates a fine signature in the foreset deposit. Base level fall has the opposite effects. Entrainment of the topset mobile armor causes a coarsening of the load at the topset-foreset break and so a coarse signature in the foreset deposit. The entrainment of the topset substrate and fine top part of the foreset may follow, which causes a fining of the load and a fine signature in the foreset deposit. The fact that the upstream sediment supply requires a certain slope and bed surface texture to be transported downstream under quasi-equilibrium conditions counteracts the effects of base level change. This information travels in the downstream direction. In nature base level change is likely so slow that the upstream sediment load maintains the topset slope and bed surface texture and so keeps the topset in a quasi-equilibrium state. Base level change is therefore not expected to leave a clear signal in a mixed-sediment Gilbert delta other than a change in elevation of the topset-foreset interface.

Downstream fining of bed sediment in alluvial rivers is usually gradual, but often an abrupt decrease in characteristic grain size occurs from about 10 to 1 mm, i.e., a gravel-sand transition (GST) or gravel front. Here we present an analytical model of GST migration that explicitly accounts for gravel and sand transport and deposition in the gravel reach, sea level change, subsidence, and delta progradation. The model shows that even a limited gravel supply to a sand bed reach induces progradation of a gravel wedge and predicts the circumstances required for the gravel front to advance, retreat, and halt. Predicted modern GST migration rates agree well with measured data at Allt Dubhaig and the Fraser River, and the model qualitatively captures the behavior of other documented gravel fronts. The analysis shows that sea level change, subsidence, and delta progradation have a significant impact on the GST position in lowland rivers.

The main objective of this research is to  improve our understanding of the relative  contribution of the causes of long-term bed  degradation in Rhine and other degrading  rivers. That is, the research is intended to  quantify past channel adjustment processes,  mainly bed degradation and bed surface  coarsening over time and space, and to predict  future trends, in bed elevation and bed surface  texture, resulting from past interventions. 

There has been quite some debate on the relative importance of particle abrasion and grain size selective transport regarding the river profile form and the associated grain size trends in a graded alluvial stream. Here we present new theoretical equations for the graded alluvial river profile that account for the effects of particle abrasion and grain size selective transport in the absence of subsidence, uplift, and sea level change. Under graded conditions we find that abrasion results in a mild profile concavity and downstream fining, whereas under aggradational conditions grain size selective transport can lead to large spatial changes in channel slope and bed surface mean grain size.