The Algorithm Selection Problem (ASP) presents a significant challenge in numerous industries, requiring optimal solutions for complex computational problems. Traditional approaches to solving ASP often rely on complex, black-box models like random forests, which are effective but lack transparency, and they often fail to balance performance with interpretability. This paper investigates the performance-interpretability trade-off for the ASP, specifically focused on Optimal Decision Trees (ODTs) as recent innovations have made the use of ODTs more viable. We compare ODTs against 4 other tree-based models, using 11 different datasets. We show there is no apparent tradeoff between performance and interpretability for ODTs which have been trained using an instance cost-sensitive approach, as they achieve comparable performance to a Random Forest Regressor while maintaining interpretability through multiple orders of magnitude fewer leaf nodes.