Several waterway protection structures in the Netherlands dealt with rapid degrading armourstone after construction. This suggests that the current selection procedure of armourstones is not flawless to all degradation mechanisms, especially in dynamic environments. In this work armourstone is meant to include all rock that is used in river, coastal and offshore constructions, including rip rap and rock fill. Armourstones are in the Netherlands selected by their CE marking, which lists the description of the armourstone product and information on regulated characteristics. These characteristics are tested according to the European standard EN 13381-1&2:2002, which specifies the properties of aggregate acquired by processing natural materials for use as armourstone. This research is executed to provide a contribution in the quality control and assessment of armourstone and rock fill to ensure proper handling and installation in coastal and waterway protection structures. The research started with a durability investigation according to the standard EN 133831&2:2002 on sampled sandstones and limestones that will be used in a submarine trench backfill, to check the regulated armourstone characteristics. Next, a petrographic analysis under the microscope was performed on methylene blue (MB) stained thin rock sections to investigate the presence of deleterious constituents and structures. This analysis was followed by extensive index testing to investigate the applicability of simple testing tools in a durability investigation. These tools include the Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) test, an indirect tensile strength test, the Equotip test, a surface hardness tester that records the surface rebound of an impact body, and the MB adsorption and staining test. MB is a dye that colours constituents with an excess in negative electric charges. The tests according to EN 13383-1&2:2002 suggested that the sampled armourstone bulk satisfies the required durability parameters and no evidence was found that indicates rapid degradation during the engineering lifetime. Nevertheless, variability in the armourstone pieces was spotted and some individual rock pieces approached or exceeded minimum durability requirements. The BTS test revealed considerable variation in tensile strength, a key parameter to assess degradation, between armourstone blocks and within a single block when a similar orientation of the bedding was maintained. Moreover, the orientation of the bedding in the sandstone had large influence on the tensile strength, where the values obtained perpendicular on the bedding were twice as high than parallel to the bedding. Single impact method (SIM) Equotip measurements on rough, untreated aggregate surfaces were consistent. The rebounds correlated to visual features like grain size, cracks, surface roughness and degree of weathering within handheld specimens. Equotip measurements on the rock cores and sawn surfaces obtained higher mean rebound values and smaller standard deviations. The mean and standard deviation are considered most suitable to be used in a durability investigation. The repeated impact method (RIM) by the Equotip was not successful to indicate the degree of weathering of single hand specimens. The mean Equotip values on the aggregate correlated well to the water absorption when divided into proper density and size classes. The mean rebounds on the cores distinguished well between weathered and intact cores when saturated, and correlate well to the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) values. Furthermore, the Equotip mean rebound value related to the BTS value when performed on isotropic rock disks. The MB adsorption test and MB staining of the thin sections indicated the presence of localised spots and laminae rich in clay or organic matter. The staining of sawn aggregate surfaces agreed with some of the deleterious structures in the thin sections, yet was not consistent throughout the tested rock pieces and varied between the dark coloured limestone and light coloured sandstone. The Equotip test, BTS test and MB adsorption test are quick, easy and cheap methods to obtain more understanding in variability and rock behaviour which are not necessarily captured by the standard laboratory tests according to EN 13383-1&2:2002. The simple index tests should always be accompanied by the standard laboratory tests to provide a proper reference and understanding. Detailed mechanical durability tests, like the slaking test or wet-dry cyclic tests, should be performed when the durability assessment indicates a high amount of deleterious minerals and structures, to identify the amount of degradation caused by swelling behaviour of these minerals.